30초 요약
Matthew Berman asks Gemini 4 Argon to build an Excel-like browser application and tries basic arithmetic and SUM operations. He notes a formula-entry error and argues that code alone may become less defensible as a business advantage. The short demonstration does not establish feature parity with Excel or that full software products will cost nothing.
- 1A quick prototypeBerman asks Argon to recreate a spreadsheet interface and says the run took about 20 minutes.
- 2Testing formulasHe tests basic arithmetic and SUM while observing a formula-entry error.
- 3Business implicationsHe predicts falling software costs and argues that products need advantages beyond their code.
핵심 정리
- The model produced a browser spreadsheet prototype in roughly 20 minutes in Berman's demonstration.
- Simple arithmetic and a SUM selection work in the shown test, though one formula-entry error occurs.
- A handful of formula checks do not establish compatibility, reliability or full Excel feature parity.
- Berman's prediction that software will become nearly free is an opinion, not a cost measurement.
챕터별로 다듬은 전문 읽기
Building and testing a spreadsheet
Berman shows a browser prototype and tries a few formulas. He reflects on the potential implications for software businesses.
I asked Gemini 4 Argon to clone Excel. I did not set up an extended loop, so it ran for about 20 minutes; during the run it opened Excel on my computer to inspect it. The result resembles Excel in a browser, and I like the initial appearance.
I enter a simple addition formula and it works. When I drag and try a SUM formula, I notice an error: the equals sign should have remained at the beginning. After re-entering it, I select rows and the shown SUM calculation works. These checks cover only a small fraction of spreadsheet behavior.
I think this points toward software becoming very inexpensive and that businesses will need advantages beyond lines of code. That is my prediction: building, testing, maintaining and operating a complete product can still involve substantial costs, and this prototype does not establish parity with Excel.
같은 채널의 다른 글
34:21EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 27일Matthew Berman Examines Anthropic’s IPO Filing, AI Growth and GovernanceMatthew Berman, Sam Altman · Forward FutureThe presenter reviews the S-1’s financial metrics, compute strategy and voting structure while questioning the tension between rapid AI development and safety.
0:36ENMatthew Berman· 2026년 10월 25일Kimi K3.1 and a Rubik’s Cube Solver DemonstrationMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman shows a scrambled virtual cube being solved and gives the Kimi K3.1 test a favorable assessment.
0:21ENMatthew Berman· 2026년 10월 24일An AI-Generated Kimi Benchmark Chart Used Invented ScoresMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman asks for a graph of Kimi K3.1 Pro benchmarks, then discovers that the displayed figures are illustrative placeholders.
25:50ENMatthew Berman· 2026년 10월 24일Kimi K3.1 Pro Tested: Strong 3D Demos, Uneven Results and Competitive PricingMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests the open-weight model on coding, 3D rendering and visual explanations, then compares benchmark results and prices.
32:20ENMatthew Berman· 2026년 10월 23일Who Is Local AI For? The Costs, Trade-offs and a Hybrid FutureMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman weighs data control and independence against hardware cost, setup complexity and inference speed.
1:03:37ENMatthew Berman· 2026년 10월 23일Matthew Berman’s Team Tests Kimi K3.1 on Animation, Games, and ChartsMatthew Berman, Alex, Brian · Forward FutureA live team AMA turns into an informal test of Kimi K3.1, from personal-agent workflows to motion graphics, a browser game, and a benchmark chart.