Andrew Ng on Four Agentic AI Design Patterns

A short excerpt identifies reflection, tools, planning and multi-agent collaboration as approaches to building AI agents.

ANAndrew Ng연사
채널
Matthew Berman
게시일
2024년 5월 13일
영상
1:00
읽기
1분
슬라이드
1
원문
영어
YouTube에서 열기
스크롤하면 영상이 오른쪽 아래로 작아져 계속 재생됩니다. 자막은 읽기 언어를 따릅니다.
읽기 언어2개 언어로 읽을 수 있음
이 글은 아직 한국어 번역이 없어 영어 원문으로 표시합니다.
요약

30초 요약

Matthew Berman introduces an excerpt of Andrew Ng’s 2024 talk on agentic workflows. Ng discusses four design patterns and the tradeoff between model quality, speed and token costs.

  1. 1A talk on agentsBerman introduces Andrew Ng and the excerpt.
  2. 2Four patternsNg names reflection, tool use, planning and multi-agent collaboration.
  3. 3Speed and costNg considers whether faster tokens from a smaller model can improve some applications.

핵심 정리

  1. Ng identifies reflection and tool use as practical agent patterns.
  2. He describes planning and multi-agent collaboration as emerging approaches.
  3. Faster, lower-quality models may be useful in some workflows, depending on costs and task performance.
전문

챕터별로 다듬은 전문 읽기

원본 자막만 보기
01

Agent design patterns

Ng introduces four patterns after Berman’s introduction.

Matthew Berman introduces a talk by Andrew Ng about practical approaches to AI agents. Ng says he wants to make the discussion concrete by describing recurring design patterns.

Four agentic reasoning patterns
슬라이드 1 / 1Four agentic reasoning patternsThe slide lists reflection, tool use, planning and multi-agent collaboration.

Ng identifies reflection and tool use as useful patterns, while describing planning and multi-agent collaboration as more emerging. He says these methods can sometimes produce surprisingly strong results.

02

Model speed and cost

He discusses a possible tradeoff between token speed, model quality and cost.

Ng suggests that generating tokens quickly from a somewhat less capable model might work well for some applications compared with a slower, stronger model. He says the cost of those tokens also matters; this is a conditional observation, not a universal benchmark result.

같은 채널의 다른 글

슬라이드 12장34:21EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 27일Matthew Berman Examines Anthropic’s IPO Filing, AI Growth and GovernanceMatthew Berman, Sam Altman · Forward FutureThe presenter reviews the S-1’s financial metrics, compute strategy and voting structure while questioning the tension between rapid AI development and safety.AnthropicAI Safety엔터프라이즈 AI+2
슬라이드 6장25:50EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 24일Kimi K3.1 Pro Tested: Strong 3D Demos, Uneven Results and Competitive PricingMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests the open-weight model on coding, 3D rendering and visual explanations, then compares benchmark results and prices.Open-weight modelsBenchmarksAI cost & performance+1
슬라이드 2장32:20EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 23일Who Is Local AI For? The Costs, Trade-offs and a Hybrid FutureMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman weighs data control and independence against hardware cost, setup complexity and inference speed.Local inferenceOpen-weight modelsAI cost & performance+1
슬라이드 6장1:03:37EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 23일Matthew Berman’s Team Tests Kimi K3.1 on Animation, Games, and ChartsMatthew Berman, Alex, Brian · Forward FutureA live team AMA turns into an informal test of Kimi K3.1, from personal-agent workflows to motion graphics, a browser game, and a benchmark chart.코딩 에이전트Generative media평가(Evals)+2
0:53EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 22일Sam Altman on AI and the Discovery of New KnowledgeSam Altman · OpenAIAltman expects progress in mathematical discovery to extend to biology, materials and energy.AI for scienceMathematicsComputational Biology+1
슬라이드0:22EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 21일A Robot Bodyguard Video Shows Dramatic Rescue ScenariosMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman reacts to a short robot demonstration depicting fighting and vehicle-rescue scenarios.Robotics평가(Evals)