Andrew Ng on Four Agentic AI Design Patterns

A short excerpt identifies reflection, tools, planning and multi-agent collaboration as approaches to building AI agents.

ANAndrew Ng登壇者
チャンネル
Matthew Berman
公開日
2024年5月13日
動画
1:00
読了時間
1 分
スライド
1
原文
英語
YouTube で開く
スクロールすると動画は右下に小さくなって再生を続けます。字幕は閲覧言語に合わせて切り替わります。
閲覧言語2 言語で読めます
この記事はまだ日本語に翻訳されていないため、英語の原文を表示しています。
要約

30 秒でわかる

Matthew Berman introduces an excerpt of Andrew Ng’s 2024 talk on agentic workflows. Ng discusses four design patterns and the tradeoff between model quality, speed and token costs.

  1. 1A talk on agentsBerman introduces Andrew Ng and the excerpt.
  2. 2Four patternsNg names reflection, tool use, planning and multi-agent collaboration.
  3. 3Speed and costNg considers whether faster tokens from a smaller model can improve some applications.

ポイント

  1. Ng identifies reflection and tool use as practical agent patterns.
  2. He describes planning and multi-agent collaboration as emerging approaches.
  3. Faster, lower-quality models may be useful in some workflows, depending on costs and task performance.
全文

チャプターごとに整えた全文を読む

文字起こしのみ
01

Agent design patterns

Ng introduces four patterns after Berman’s introduction.

Matthew Berman introduces a talk by Andrew Ng about practical approaches to AI agents. Ng says he wants to make the discussion concrete by describing recurring design patterns.

Four agentic reasoning patterns
スライド 1 / 1Four agentic reasoning patternsThe slide lists reflection, tool use, planning and multi-agent collaboration.

Ng identifies reflection and tool use as useful patterns, while describing planning and multi-agent collaboration as more emerging. He says these methods can sometimes produce surprisingly strong results.

02

Model speed and cost

He discusses a possible tradeoff between token speed, model quality and cost.

Ng suggests that generating tokens quickly from a somewhat less capable model might work well for some applications compared with a slower, stronger model. He says the cost of those tokens also matters; this is a conditional observation, not a universal benchmark result.

同じチャンネルの記事

スライド 12 枚34:21EN
Matthew Berman· 2026年10月27日Matthew Berman Examines Anthropic’s IPO Filing, AI Growth and GovernanceMatthew Berman, Sam Altman · Forward FutureThe presenter reviews the S-1’s financial metrics, compute strategy and voting structure while questioning the tension between rapid AI development and safety.AnthropicAI Safetyエンタープライズ AI+2
スライド 6 枚25:50EN
Matthew Berman· 2026年10月24日Kimi K3.1 Pro Tested: Strong 3D Demos, Uneven Results and Competitive PricingMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests the open-weight model on coding, 3D rendering and visual explanations, then compares benchmark results and prices.Open-weight modelsBenchmarksAI cost & performance+1
スライド 2 枚32:20EN
Matthew Berman· 2026年10月23日Who Is Local AI For? The Costs, Trade-offs and a Hybrid FutureMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman weighs data control and independence against hardware cost, setup complexity and inference speed.Local inferenceOpen-weight modelsAI cost & performance+1
スライド 6 枚1:03:37EN
Matthew Berman· 2026年10月23日Matthew Berman’s Team Tests Kimi K3.1 on Animation, Games, and ChartsMatthew Berman, Alex, Brian · Forward FutureA live team AMA turns into an informal test of Kimi K3.1, from personal-agent workflows to motion graphics, a browser game, and a benchmark chart.コーディングエージェントGenerative media評価(Evals)+2
0:53EN
Matthew Berman· 2026年10月22日Sam Altman on AI and the Discovery of New KnowledgeSam Altman · OpenAIAltman expects progress in mathematical discovery to extend to biology, materials and energy.AI for scienceMathematicsComputational Biology+1
スライド0:22EN
Matthew Berman· 2026年10月21日A Robot Bodyguard Video Shows Dramatic Rescue ScenariosMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman reacts to a short robot demonstration depicting fighting and vehicle-rescue scenarios.Robotics評価(Evals)