低效产品公司都长一个样,高效的却各不相同

原标题Every Dysfunctional Team Looks Alike, Every Great One Looks Different: Lessons from John Cutler's Years Inside Hundreds of Product Teams

Amplitude 前产品布道者 John Cutler 讲高效产品团队真正差在哪、为什么网上的框架不能照搬,以及如何在混乱的公司里把学习闭环转起来。

JCJohn Cutler嘉宾
频道
Lenny's Podcast
视频
1:40:44
阅读
1 分钟
原文
英语
在 YouTube 打开
往下滚动阅读时,视频会缩到右下角继续播放。字幕跟随阅读语言。
阅读语言共 2 种语言可读
简体中文目前只有摘要,下面的全文是英语原文。
摘要

30 秒看懂

John Cutler 是 newsletter The Beautiful Mess 的作者,在 Amplitude 做了大约四年产品布道者。他靠数百次一对一和大量工作坊观察到:高效产品团队成功的路径很不一样,但都有策略、结构和领导层之间的一致性。他提醒人们不要把硅谷框架当终点去抄,而要把注意力放在把从策略到学习的实践闭环真正跑完。

  1. 1Cutler 转述朋友 Josh Arnold 的反向安娜·卡列尼娜原则:功能失调的产品公司都差不多,高效的却可以用完全不同的方式成功。
  2. 2他观察到的共性是:公司结构与当前策略一致、强观点松持有、对产品手艺近乎非理性的信念,以及言行一致的领导层。
  3. 3常识并不等于容易落地。像请 bar-raiser 面试、绝不拿质量做交换,听起来都理所当然,真正运转起来才是难处。
  4. 4Cutler 不信任把框架当终点来装的做法。他把它看成帮团队保持轨道的工作辅助,健康团队会在它失效时自己重造。
  5. 5技能是知识乘以练习,再被环境、习惯和动机调节。与其再读一条建议,不如数一数自己能把从策略到学习的闭环跑完几圈。
  6. 6在缓慢、瀑布式的公司里,人们往往低估自己还能推动哪些闭环。 就算上面点名做 X,你仍可以写一页纸、定义成功长什么样、记下假设,边做边攒作品集。
全文

按章节阅读整理后的全文

01

一份免费教练工作,让他看见了数百支产品团队

John Cutler spent about four years at Amplitude with the unusual title of product evangelist, a job that Sandhya from the company floated to him as customers beyond classic growth-stage startups began to arrive. Each day he talked to current or future customers, ran workshops and coaching sessions, and held what he called product therapy sessions in which he simply absorbed whatever problems people brought. He estimates roughly 800 one-on-ones with leaders and, at the peak, around 150 workshops in a single year, plus talks for tens of thousands.

Cutler stresses that the well-known Amplitude artifacts were team efforts rather than marketing flashes. The North Star material grew out of a workshop Sandhya improvised for a customer, and the retention and engagement playbooks started as a 110-page body of research from the customer success team. He also insists the company never invented the North Star framework and says he always corrects people on LinkedIn who suggest otherwise.

Cutler describes the access as once in a lifetime: one day Amazon or Ikea, the next a two-person startup or Figma. He notes that, unlike a paid consultant, he did not choose who came to him, so he saw teams reach similar results in very different ways. That experience, he says, taught him the power of context, and it led him to join Toast to enable product teams from the inside in a vertical SaaS business.

02

拥抱混乱,就是拒绝没有语境、只讲个人的产品建议

Lenny relays a spicy listener question, raised by Jason Cohen, that Cutler's newsletter often lacks a clear recommendation. Cutler welcomes the criticism and jokes that The Beautiful Mess sounds like an emo band name. He explains that four years earlier he had scanned the product-advice landscape and noticed three dominant themes: success as tools, skills and mindset; a meritocratic, highly individualistic worldview; and advice stripped of context so it can be actionable.

Cutler says he does not judge those perspectives, and he admires people who produce crisp, actionable content. His own angle was to explore complex adaptive systems, where teams are nested inside larger systems and effects are non-linear, and to dig into counterintuitive dynamics. He gives two examples: teams loading themselves with too much work in progress despite knowing better, and executive strategies of three neat pillars that leave everyone unsure what to do.

The tension, he says, is that getting anything done requires reducing the world a little. The difference between oversimplifying and focusing is deciding which variables to hold constant. Lenny admits he feels the same pull, noting that he added the word mostly to a post about virality being a myth, and Cutler jokes that his own posts always say mostly, maybe or it depends.

03

高效团队彼此差得很远,共同点是一致性和对产品的固执信念

Asked what differentiates the best product teams, Cutler starts with a friend Josh Arnold's reverse Anna Karenina principle. In Tolstoy's novel unhappy families differ and happy ones are alike, but with product companies the dysfunctional ones share easy-to-spot anti-patterns, while the high performers get there in vastly different ways. As examples, great product leaders can be humble servant leaders or dominant sparring partners, and good decisions can come from rigorous red-team processes, serendipitous collaboration or a top-down CEO.

Within that diversity he names a few recurring patterns. High performers have coherence between their structure, incentives, technical architecture and current strategy, and even brilliant hires cannot escape a strategy-structure mismatch. They hold strong opinions loosely, with a stubborn belief in things like customer contact or craft that survives short-term doubts. They also share a slightly irrational faith in what separates a nine-level product from a seven, citing the Bezos idea that today's success was set in motion years ago.

Cutler adds that leadership must be coherent, so that words and actions match, and that skills need to fit the context. Lenny summarizes five attributes: coherence with strategy, strong opinions loosely held, belief in the power of product, coherent leadership, and the necessary skills. Cutler's point is that these sound like common sense, yet common sense is hard to put in motion, and he illustrates it with Amazon's bar-raiser hiring and the founders of AppFolio, who refused to trade away quality or customer contact.

04

这不是人还是流程的二选一,先检查你自己的偏好

Lenny asks what share of success comes from the people a company hires and whether a team can become high-performing at all. Cutler calls it the trillion-dollar question and declines to give a percentage. He notes that a room of geniuses fails without coherent leadership and structure, while teams of people who have not done it before sometimes succeed with the right things in motion. Many high performers either vet everyone heavily or keep people for years and are good at growing them.

He says everyone should challenge their happy place. Years ago he believed skill barely mattered and that bad management explains everything, and he still leans toward giving people a seventh chance. He sees the opposite error in leaders who insist on only A-plus players or blame whoever was in charge when things went wrong. Using Satya Nadella as an example, he adds that heroic stories oversimplify, since a leader acts amid wealth of talent, structures, boards and market conditions.

For a founder deciding between investing in process or people, Cutler's first piece of advice is introspection: know what you and the people around you believe, and aim to be a coherent leader. You can nudge yourself away from your natural style but not move all the way from a process-driven meritocrat to a consensus-driven collective. Lenny observes that companies lifted by a hot market can look like the work of a genius until the market turns.

05

文化是一致性下面的那层布,而且各国说的不是同一件事

Asked why culture was not on his list, Cutler says it is the fabric that creates those other things, so he almost took it for granted. He points out that a value such as ownership means something different in an individualistic culture than in a collectivist one. The useful move, which he credits to Amplitude and Spencer, is to describe the behaviors that show what ownership looks like rather than just declaring the value.

Cutler declines to name a best company, preferring to recall moments when a team was clicking despite difficulty. One example is Angela, a leader at Lego, who he says has things dialed in while transforming a very large business with one of the world's most iconic brands toward digital. He also recalls a team in India with passion and curiosity and no jaded people in the room.

On differences across countries, Cutler defers to Erin Meyer's book The Culture Map but names two he noticed. One is individualism versus a communitarian view of the team; in an extreme individualistic setup, an engineering manager brokers a premier project for each engineer who wants promotion. The other is how deferential a culture is to hierarchy, which shapes how information flows.

06

非硅谷公司该小剂量改建议,而不是整套安装框架

Lenny notes that most PMs do not work at Silicon Valley startups and that many are in transformations. Cutler says some of his most rewarding conversations were with such companies, which face huge inertia: executives who may never have shipped product, annual budgeting cycles, large IT organizations and a belief that there is only one way to work. His first suggestion is to create pods where a team can get its reps, meaning shipping and going through the full learning loop.

His second is to think about frameworks appropriately. Many companies read how Figma works and treat adopting the frameworks as the end goal, whereas he sees a framework as a job aid for staying on track, and such companies should reinvent tools when they stop working. He also reminds listeners that Silicon Valley advice is optimized for a first big arc of growth and for pure digital products, not for legacy businesses or logistics-heavy ones.

Cutler points to a fundamental attribution bias: successful companies underrate luck and inertia, while big companies overestimate their systemic drag. He rejects a simple split between big slow companies and nimble modern ones, citing an Australian plumbing company with the revenue of 50 startups, Anheuser-Busch's BEES distribution app, and Brazil's NewBank. For further reading he recommends John Smart's book Better, Sooner, Safer, Happier and notes the universal appeal of Teresa Torres's techniques.

07

技能是知识乘以练习,所以该数闭环,而不是数播客

Cutler says the internet is a firehose of amazing information, but he wishes someone would just summarize what to do when waking up, joking about Andrew Huberman-style life hacks. His reminder is that skill is knowledge times practice, mediated by environment, habits and motivation. Working with learning experience designers at Amplitude taught him that consuming knowledge is not enough; people need to go around a loop repeatedly.

He describes Amplitude's data-informed product loop: set a strategy, build qualitative models such as a North Star framework, add measurement, prioritize, design bets, measure their impact and circulate the learning back. Breaking the loop at any point stops progress, and the loop also shows where you are weak. He worries that many leaders feel beaten up by the advice industry and believes shifting focus to getting the loop going for your team, career or company is a safe bet.

Lenny suggests just-in-time learning, saving material until he needs it, such as SEO. Cutler agrees but adds that listening broadly builds spidey sense: you learn that pricing, meeting design or service design are real disciplines, so you can tell when someone oversimplifies them. He compares it to seeing a genius professor as a freshman and not understanding everything, yet learning that the subject exists.

08

即便在瀑布式公司里,你也可以把闭环往前推,并记下自己做了什么

For people at slow, waterfall companies, Cutler's first point is that they usually underestimate the loops available to them. If an executive says to build X, you can write a one-pager treating X as one of five options, ask what would be observed if it were working, or document assumptions and risks. Each small nudge counts as going through the motions, and he urges people to work with what they have.

He argues you should write your portfolio as you go, because two years later everything will feel like a blur and you will only be able to say you worked at a messed-up company. He acknowledges that some people cannot leave their jobs and that many things can be true at once. He adds that top-tier and hypergrowth companies can be equally chaotic.

Cutler uses a model of chronic versus acute challenges: some companies work down their chronic issues, which lets them face acute stressors, while others are mired in acute ones. His example is the pandemic, where 15 to 20 companies that deliberately designed their response, rather than leaving managers to cope and waiting for normal, fared an order of magnitude better in the happiness of their people. He sees that as coherent action against a clearly seen threat.

09

产品感该拆成可教的技能,榜样也该更多样

Cutler says he is trying to stop using vague words like product sense and product mindset and to unpack them into skills that can be taught, such as problem modeling, systems thinking, decision-making under uncertainty and facilitation. He cites a should-versus-can divide he discussed with Craig at Toast and says the more interesting question is what skills the should person brings, such as decoupling current tactics from optimal ones. That, he says, will be part of his role at Toast.

He also wants more diverse role models, including leaders who are not on Twitter. He tells of a woman who feared that, to get ahead in tech, she had to adopt a very individualistic, meritocratic outlook she did not share. Cutler told her about companies and leaders, including Carrie in Santa Barbara, who work with a real team vibe, and she found that reassuring.

On writing alongside a day job, Cutler admits many posts come together at 1 a.m. on a Thursday, which can explain why they stop short of an answer. He hopes to offer more mental models for dealing with the mess, such as a model that separates clear, complicated, complex and chaotic systems, Simon Wardley's mapping, and his own Pyramid of Leadership Self-Awareness. He also wants to package his 700 to 900 posts, hundreds of images and talks into a meta-guide to his content.

10

分析从很小开始,测量只为减少不确定性

Answering a Twitter question about what he could not say while at Amplitude, Cutler says he rarely held back, but he would have been more adamant about an anti-pattern in analytics adoption. Companies undertake huge implementations, spending months documenting every event and metric. He would tell them to use the free plan, instrument a few events with their developers in a three-hour session and start getting value, since you do not yet know what you do not know.

In the lightning round, Cutler recommends three books. Douglas Hubbard's How to Measure Anything argues that measurement exists to reduce uncertainty enough to make the next decision. Accelerate, by Nicole Forsgren, Jez Humble and Gene Kim, models performance using survey research behind the DORA reports. Jeff Patton's book on user story mapping is, in his words, deceptively simple and still has companies buzzing a year after they learn it.

His favorite interview technique is to ask candidates to retell a behavioral story from the perspective of a colleague they mentioned, which reveals self-awareness and whether they cast themselves as the hero. He ends with a snack-focused parenting tip and asks listeners to send recommendations of people the community should hear more from, as he hopes to start a guest speaker series at Toast.

同频道的其他文章

1:10:27EN → 简体中文
Lenny's Podcast播客 · 2 人对谈硬技能让你进门,软技能决定你能走多远嘉宾 Jules Walter · 主持 Lenny RachitskyYouTube 产品负责人 Jules Walter 把 PM 能力拆成 IQ 与 EQ,并讲怎样用最小请求找到导师、把反馈变成习惯。产品与体验Product ManagementLeadership+3
1:30:46EN → 简体中文
Lenny's Podcast播客跳过「末日漏斗」:Cursor 招顶尖 50 人的打法主持 Lenny RachitskyCursor 人才负责人 Adam Ward 讲如何界定角色、画出全球大约 50 人的名单,再持续追他们,而不是招漏斗里活下来的人。企业与战略Company BuildingLeadership+3
1:42:04EN → 简体中文
Lenny's Podcast播客 · 2 人对谈先做生命体征测试,再谈把付费增长拧到最大嘉宾 Timothy Davis · 主持 Lenny RachitskyShopify 绩效营销负责人 Timothy Davis 讲何时开始买量、怎么做小测试、测哪些平台、看什么指标、以及先招什么样的人。企业与战略Go-to-MarketGrowth Strategy+3
1:21:44EN → 简体中文
Lenny's Podcast播客从划桨到掌舵:OpenAI 如何把 Agent 做成持久共事的同事主持 Lenny Rachitsky负责 Codex 与 ChatGPT Work 产品的 Tara Seshan 解释:当 Agent 负责划桨、人负责掌舵时,产品经理的工作会变成什么样。智能体Product StrategyAI Product Management+3
1:01:00EN → 简体中文
Lenny's Podcast播客 · 2 人对谈谁掌握注意力:Substack 如何按「控制权」做产品嘉宾 Sachin Monga · 主持 Lenny RachitskySubstack 产品负责人 Sachin Monga 讲路线图背后的原则、Recommendations 如何长成增长引擎,以及他认为互联网写作的下一阶段会怎样。产品与体验Product StrategyGrowth Strategy+3
1:26:22EN → 简体中文
Lenny's Podcast播客先从小处开始,再挣来自主权:五十多次企业 AI 落地教会他们的事主持 Lenny RachitskyAishwarya Naresh Reganti 和 Kiriti Badam 解释,为什么 AI 产品需要另一套构建流程,以及怎样一步步提高 Agent 自主权而不丢掉客户信任。产品与体验Product StrategyAI Product Management+3