A DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Portrait Painted Through a Browser Tool

Matthew Berman compares a reference headshot with a stylized result made using a Paint-like website.

MBMatthew Berman연사 · Forward Future
채널
Matthew Berman
게시일
2026년 10월 4일
영상
0:26
읽기
1분
슬라이드
1
원문
영어
YouTube에서 열기
스크롤하면 영상이 오른쪽 아래로 작아져 계속 재생됩니다. 자막은 읽기 언어를 따릅니다.
읽기 언어2개 언어로 읽을 수 있음
이 글은 아직 한국어 번역이 없어 영어 원문으로 표시합니다.
요약

30초 요약

Matthew Berman shows a brief experiment in which DeepSeek V4.1 Flash uses a browser-based painting tool to recreate his headshot. He finds the result recognizable and stylized but lacking detail and layered brushwork.

  1. 1The referenceBerman supplies a headshot and lets DeepSeek V4.1 Flash use a Paint-like website.
  2. 2The resultThe displayed output is an abstract, stylized version of the headshot.
  3. 3Missing detailBerman says the model did not reproduce the layered brushstroke technique he had in mind.

핵심 정리

  1. The experiment uses a reference headshot and a website resembling Microsoft Paint.
  2. Berman judges the resulting portrait stylized but lacking detail.
  3. A single example does not establish general portrait-painting performance.
전문

챕터별로 다듬은 전문 읽기

원본 자막만 보기
01

A browser-painting experiment

Berman introduces the reference image and the tool used by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash. He then assesses the resulting portrait.

The generated portrait
슬라이드 1 / 1The generated portraitThe clip shows the stylized result alongside Berman’s assessment of its limited detail.

Here is the reference headshot. I let DeepSeek V4.1 Flash use a website that replicates the basic functionality of Microsoft Paint, then compare the resulting portrait with the original. The short video does not show the complete setup or a controlled comparison.

The result is not bad: it is a very stylized, abstract version of my headshot. But it lacks detail, and I think the model did not reproduce the technique of building up one brushstroke over another. That judgment applies to this particular attempt.

같은 채널의 다른 글

슬라이드 5장14:45EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 29일Matthew Berman Examines Google’s Gemini 4 Carbon AnnouncementMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman reviews Google’s reported benchmark results, staged rollout and pricing for Gemini 4 Carbon, while noting he has not yet used the model.Foundation ModelsBenchmarksAI cost & performance+2
슬라이드 12장34:21EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 27일Matthew Berman Examines Anthropic’s IPO Filing, AI Growth and GovernanceMatthew Berman, Sam Altman · Forward FutureThe presenter reviews the S-1’s financial metrics, compute strategy and voting structure while questioning the tension between rapid AI development and safety.AnthropicAI Safety엔터프라이즈 AI+2
0:26EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 25일Sam Altman on Human Values and Problem-Solving in an AI WorldSam Altman · OpenAIIn a short interview excerpt, Altman considers the enjoyment of solving hard problems and the human role in interpreting results.Human-AI CollaborationFuture of WorkAI Strategy
슬라이드 2장0:36EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 25일Kimi K3.1 and a Rubik’s Cube Solver DemonstrationMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman shows a scrambled virtual cube being solved and gives the Kimi K3.1 test a favorable assessment.평가(Evals)코딩 에이전트Open-weight models
슬라이드 2장0:21EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 24일An AI-Generated Kimi Benchmark Chart Used Invented ScoresMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman asks for a graph of Kimi K3.1 Pro benchmarks, then discovers that the displayed figures are illustrative placeholders.Benchmarks평가(Evals)Generative media
슬라이드 6장25:50EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 24일Kimi K3.1 Pro Tested: Strong 3D Demos, Uneven Results and Competitive PricingMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests the open-weight model on coding, 3D rendering and visual explanations, then compares benchmark results and prices.Open-weight modelsBenchmarksAI cost & performance+1