GPT-5.2 at Launch: Benchmark Results, Demos and API Pricing

Matthew Berman reviews OpenAI’s December 2025 announcement, highlighting selected evaluations, product demos and the cost increase over GPT-5.1.

MBMatthew Berman연사 · Forward Future
채널
Matthew Berman
게시일
2025년 12월 12일
영상
1:58
읽기
2분
슬라이드
4
원문
영어
YouTube에서 열기
스크롤하면 영상이 오른쪽 아래로 작아져 계속 재생됩니다. 자막은 읽기 언어를 따릅니다.
읽기 언어2개 언어로 읽을 수 있음
이 글은 아직 한국어 번역이 없어 영어 원문으로 표시합니다.
요약

30초 요약

In this short December 2025 video, Matthew Berman presents OpenAI’s launch figures for GPT-5.2 and examples of spreadsheets, software and image understanding. The comparisons are from OpenAI’s selected tests and demonstrations rather than an independent assessment. He also reviews launch-era API prices and ChatGPT rollout plans. The GDPval comparison shown is with GPT-5, despite his description as a comparison with GPT-5.1.

  1. 1Knowledge-work comparisonOpenAI’s GDPval table reports 70.9% wins or ties for GPT-5.2 Thinking versus 38.8% for GPT-5.
  2. 2Coding and mathThe launch chart lists 55.6% on SWE-bench Pro and 100% on AIME 2025 for GPT-5.2 Thinking.
  3. 3Abstract reasoningOpenAI reports 52.9% on ARC-AGI-2 Verified for GPT-5.2 Thinking, compared with 17.6% for GPT-5.1 Thinking.
  4. 4Historical API pricingThe launch chart lists $1.75 per million input tokens and $14 per million output tokens for standard GPT-5.2.

핵심 정리

  1. OpenAI reported GPT-5.2 Thinking at 70.9% wins or ties on GDPval versus 38.8% for GPT-5, not GPT-5.1.
  2. The launch table reported 55.6% on SWE-bench Pro and 100% on AIME 2025 for GPT-5.2 Thinking under its stated conditions.
  3. OpenAI reported 52.9% on ARC-AGI-2 Verified for GPT-5.2 Thinking versus 17.6% for GPT-5.1 Thinking.
  4. The spreadsheet, software and motherboard examples are selected demonstrations and do not establish universal performance.
  5. At launch, standard GPT-5.2 API input and output prices shown were higher than those for GPT-5.1.
전문

챕터별로 다듬은 전문 읽기

원본 자막만 보기
01

OpenAI’s benchmark claims

Berman highlights launch results for knowledge work, coding, mathematics and abstract reasoning. The displayed GDPval baseline is GPT-5, despite his reference to GPT-5.1.

Launch benchmark table
슬라이드 1 / 4Launch benchmark tableOpenAI’s table labels the GDPval baseline as GPT-5 and lists selected coding and mathematics results.

In December 2025, Matthew Berman reviews OpenAI’s introduction of GPT-5.2, highlighting its reported benchmark improvements. The launch chart shows GPT-5.2 Thinking winning or tying human professionals on 70.9% of GDPval tasks versus 38.8% for GPT-5; Berman describes the baseline as GPT-5.1, but the displayed table identifies GPT-5.

ARC-AGI-2 comparison
슬라이드 2 / 4ARC-AGI-2 comparisonThe launch table reports 52.9% for GPT-5.2 Thinking and 17.6% for GPT-5.1 Thinking.

OpenAI’s table reports GPT-5.2 Thinking at 55.6% on SWE-bench Pro versus 50.8% for GPT-5.1 Thinking, and 100% versus 94% on AIME 2025 without tools. On ARC-AGI-2 Verified, the reported scores are 52.9% and 17.6% respectively. These are provider-reported research evaluations under specified conditions, not proof of general intelligence or a universal ranking.

02

Selected demos and pricing

The video shows spreadsheets, a project-management example, an ocean-wave simulation and motherboard labels. Berman closes with the initial rollout and API prices.

Berman compares selected examples of a spreadsheet and a project-management output, saying the newer model produces a more polished result. He then shows an ocean-wave simulation with controls for wind speed, wave height and lighting. These examples illustrate outputs shown at launch rather than a systematic comparison of every task.

Ocean-wave simulation
슬라이드 3 / 4Ocean-wave simulationThe selected coding demo includes controls for wind speed, wave height and lighting.

For image understanding, he shows a motherboard-labeling comparison and says GPT-5.2 identifies more components with more precise markings. The video presents this as one visual example, not an independently verified error rate across images.

Launch-era API prices
슬라이드 4 / 4Launch-era API pricesThe table compares input, cached-input and output pricing for the model versions shown.

Berman says GPT-5.2 Instant, Thinking and Pro began rolling out to paid ChatGPT plans at launch. The displayed API table lists standard GPT-5.2 at $1.75 per million input tokens and $14 per million output tokens, compared with $1.25 and $10 for GPT-5.1. These are launch-era prices and rollout details.

같은 채널의 다른 글

슬라이드 12장34:21EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 27일Matthew Berman Examines Anthropic’s IPO Filing, AI Growth and GovernanceMatthew Berman, Sam Altman · Forward FutureThe presenter reviews the S-1’s financial metrics, compute strategy and voting structure while questioning the tension between rapid AI development and safety.AnthropicAI Safety엔터프라이즈 AI+2
0:26EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 25일Sam Altman on Human Values and Problem-Solving in an AI WorldSam Altman · OpenAIIn a short interview excerpt, Altman considers the enjoyment of solving hard problems and the human role in interpreting results.Human-AI CollaborationFuture of WorkAI Strategy
슬라이드 2장0:36EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 25일Kimi K3.1 and a Rubik’s Cube Solver DemonstrationMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman shows a scrambled virtual cube being solved and gives the Kimi K3.1 test a favorable assessment.평가(Evals)코딩 에이전트Open-weight models
슬라이드 2장0:21EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 24일An AI-Generated Kimi Benchmark Chart Used Invented ScoresMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman asks for a graph of Kimi K3.1 Pro benchmarks, then discovers that the displayed figures are illustrative placeholders.Benchmarks평가(Evals)Generative media
슬라이드 6장25:50EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 24일Kimi K3.1 Pro Tested: Strong 3D Demos, Uneven Results and Competitive PricingMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests the open-weight model on coding, 3D rendering and visual explanations, then compares benchmark results and prices.Open-weight modelsBenchmarksAI cost & performance+1
슬라이드 2장32:20EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 23일Who Is Local AI For? The Costs, Trade-offs and a Hybrid FutureMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman weighs data control and independence against hardware cost, setup complexity and inference speed.Local inferenceOpen-weight modelsAI cost & performance+1