Matthew Berman's AI-Assisted Super Mario World Recreation

A short progress update describes a multi-day attempt to rebuild the game for a ModRetro handheld.

MBMatthew Berman연사 · Forward Future
채널
Matthew Berman
게시일
2026년 10월 12일
영상
0:46
읽기
1분
원문
영어
YouTube에서 열기
스크롤하면 영상이 오른쪽 아래로 작아져 계속 재생됩니다. 자막은 읽기 언어를 따릅니다.
읽기 언어2개 언어로 읽을 수 있음
이 글은 아직 한국어 번역이 없어 영어 원문으로 표시합니다.
요약

30초 요약

Matthew Berman says he tasked GPT-6.1 Sol with recreating Super Mario World for a ModRetro handheld. After more than four days, he describes an iterative process of writing code and comparing it with the game; the project is still unfinished in the clip.

  1. 1The handheldBerman says he received a ModRetro device at OpenAI DevDay and wanted to play a favorite game on it.
  2. 2A recreation taskHe tasked GPT-6.1 Sol with recreating Super Mario World for the device and says it has worked for more than four days.
  3. 3An iterative processHe describes consulting online documentation, writing code and checking the result against the game. The project is not yet finished.

핵심 정리

  1. Berman wanted to play Super Mario World on a ModRetro handheld he received at OpenAI DevDay.
  2. He says GPT-6.1 Sol has worked on a recreation for more than four days.
  3. He describes the process as writing code, comparing its appearance with the game and iterating.
  4. His expectation that the work might finish in a few more days is an estimate, not a demonstrated result.
전문

챕터별로 다듬은 전문 읽기

원본 자막만 보기
01

An unfinished game recreation

Berman describes why he started a handheld game recreation and how the AI coding process has unfolded. He estimates it may take a few more days.

At OpenAI DevDay I received a ModRetro handheld, a recreated Game Boy-style device. Super Mario World is one of my favorite games, and I wanted to play it on the handheld, although it was not made for that device.

I tasked GPT-6.1 Sol with recreating the game from scratch for ModRetro. It has been working for more than four days. I describe it as looking at how the game should appear, using documentation it finds online, writing code and comparing the result before iterating; it is not necessarily decompiling, but feels close to me.

I think it might finish in another few days. This is a progress update, not a demonstration that the recreation is complete.

같은 채널의 다른 글

슬라이드 12장34:21EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 27일Matthew Berman Examines Anthropic’s IPO Filing, AI Growth and GovernanceMatthew Berman, Sam Altman · Forward FutureThe presenter reviews the S-1’s financial metrics, compute strategy and voting structure while questioning the tension between rapid AI development and safety.AnthropicAI Safety엔터프라이즈 AI+2
0:26EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 25일Sam Altman on Human Values and Problem-Solving in an AI WorldSam Altman · OpenAIIn a short interview excerpt, Altman considers the enjoyment of solving hard problems and the human role in interpreting results.Human-AI CollaborationFuture of WorkAI Strategy
슬라이드 2장0:36EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 25일Kimi K3.1 and a Rubik’s Cube Solver DemonstrationMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman shows a scrambled virtual cube being solved and gives the Kimi K3.1 test a favorable assessment.평가(Evals)코딩 에이전트Open-weight models
슬라이드 2장0:21EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 24일An AI-Generated Kimi Benchmark Chart Used Invented ScoresMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman asks for a graph of Kimi K3.1 Pro benchmarks, then discovers that the displayed figures are illustrative placeholders.Benchmarks평가(Evals)Generative media
슬라이드 6장25:50EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 24일Kimi K3.1 Pro Tested: Strong 3D Demos, Uneven Results and Competitive PricingMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests the open-weight model on coding, 3D rendering and visual explanations, then compares benchmark results and prices.Open-weight modelsBenchmarksAI cost & performance+1
슬라이드 2장32:20EN
Matthew Berman· 2026년 10월 23일Who Is Local AI For? The Costs, Trade-offs and a Hybrid FutureMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman weighs data control and independence against hardware cost, setup complexity and inference speed.Local inferenceOpen-weight modelsAI cost & performance+1