OpenAI’s o1 Preview: A First Look at Longer Reasoning

Matthew Berman introduces the o1-preview and o1-mini models and tries a Python game prompt.

MBMatthew Berman연사 · Forward Future
채널
Matthew Berman
게시일
2024년 9월 16일
영상
0:54
읽기
1분
슬라이드
1
원문
영어
YouTube에서 열기
스크롤하면 영상이 오른쪽 아래로 작아져 계속 재생됩니다. 자막은 읽기 언어를 따릅니다.
읽기 언어2개 언어로 읽을 수 있음
이 글은 아직 한국어 번역이 없어 영어 원문으로 표시합니다.
요약

30초 요약

In this September 2024 short, Matthew Berman describes OpenAI’s newly released o1 models and tests a coding prompt. He highlights their longer reasoning time and OpenAI’s research benchmark claims.

  1. 1Two o1 modelsBerman introduces o1-preview and o1-mini, associated with the previously anticipated Strawberry model.
  2. 2More time to thinkHe says the models are designed to spend more time reasoning and cites OpenAI’s comparison with PhD students on research tests.
  3. 3A game promptHe tries a Python Tetris prompt and notes that ChatGPT shows a summary of the thought process, rather than the raw reasoning.

핵심 정리

  1. OpenAI introduced o1-preview and o1-mini as models designed to spend more time reasoning.
  2. Berman cites an OpenAI claim comparing performance on selected research tests with PhD students.
  3. His Python game prompt shows a reasoning summary and a reported 94 seconds of thinking.
전문

챕터별로 다듬은 전문 읽기

원본 자막만 보기
01

Introducing and testing o1

Berman describes the new models and their reasoning approach. He then tries a Python game prompt and reacts to the result.

OpenAI’s long-awaited Strawberry model is here. There are two models, o1-preview and o1-mini. They are designed to spend more time thinking through a problem, and OpenAI says the model performs similarly to PhD students on some research tests.

ChatGPT’s reasoning summary
슬라이드 1 / 1ChatGPT’s reasoning summaryThe interface shows the Python game prompt and a summary of the model’s reasoning.

I ask it to write a Tetris game in Python. ChatGPT shows a summary of its thought process, though not the raw reasoning, and reports thinking for 94 seconds. I try the result and react enthusiastically.

같은 채널의 다른 글

슬라이드 6장25:50EN
MBMatthew Berman· 2026년 10월 24일Kimi K3.1 Pro Tested: Strong 3D Demos, Uneven Results and Competitive PricingMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests the open-weight model on coding, 3D rendering and visual explanations, then compares benchmark results and prices.Open-weight modelsBenchmarksAI cost & performance+1
슬라이드 2장32:20EN
MBMatthew Berman· 2026년 10월 23일Who Is Local AI For? The Costs, Trade-offs and a Hybrid FutureMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman weighs data control and independence against hardware cost, setup complexity and inference speed.Local inferenceOpen-weight modelsAI cost & performance+1
45:08EN
MBMatthew Berman· 2026년 10월 21일Sam Altman on AI Discovery, Consciousness, Compute and a Human-Centered FutureMatthew Berman, Sam Altman · Forward FutureIn a conversation with Matthew Berman, Altman discusses scientific progress, personal assistants, recursive self-improvement and the importance of human agency.AI for sciencePersonal agentsConsciousness+2
슬라이드 5장12:14EN
MBMatthew Berman· 2026년 10월 14일Gemini 4 Argon Tested: 3D Demos, a Spreadsheet Prototype and Benchmark ResultsMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests Google’s model on games and visual projects, then compares reported coding and agent benchmarks.GeminiBenchmarks코딩 에이전트+1
슬라이드 5장10:36EN
MBMatthew Berman· 2026년 10월 13일Meta Muse Wonder Tested: Strong Benchmarks, Mixed Demos and Quota FrictionMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests Meta’s models on browser demos and reviews their published benchmark scores, availability and cost.모델과 학습BenchmarksAI cost & performance+1
슬라이드 2장17:37EN
MBMatthew Berman· 2026년 10월 10일AI Coding, Game Mashups and the Value of Human TasteMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman explains decompilation and game mashups, then argues that iterative AI coding changes software and creativity.코딩 에이전트Software engineeringCreativity+1