Why the Ladybug Clock Puzzle Has Probability 1/11

A random-walk argument turns a surprising simulation into a symmetry proof.

チャンネル
3Blue1Brown
公開日
2026年2月16日
動画
2:33
読了時間
1 分
スライド
3
原文
英語
YouTube で開く
スクロールすると動画は右下に小さくなって再生を続けます。字幕は閲覧言語に合わせて切り替わります。
閲覧言語2 言語で読めます
この記事はまだ日本語に翻訳されていないため、英語の原文を表示しています。
要約

30 秒でわかる

3Blue1Brown solves the ladybug clock puzzle by waiting for a first visit to a neighbor of the target. The resulting random-walk question is identical for all eleven possible last numbers, giving each probability 1/11.

  1. 1Equal-looking outcomesSimulations suggest the eleven possible last numbers are equally likely.
  2. 2Wait for a neighborThe ladybug eventually reaches a neighbor of the target with probability one.
  3. 3Reduce to a random walkFrom there the relevant walk must reach +10 before −1.
  4. 4Every number has probability 1/11The same argument applies to every number other than the starting point.

ポイント

  1. Simulations suggest the eleven possible last numbers are equally likely.
  2. The ladybug eventually reaches a neighbor of the target with probability one.
  3. From there the relevant walk must reach +10 before −1.
  4. The same argument applies to every number other than the starting point.
全文

チャプターごとに整えた全文を読む

文字起こしのみ
01

The clock puzzle

A ladybug’s random walk colors numbers on a clock.

A ladybug starts at 12 on a clock and takes random steps clockwise or counterclockwise, each with equal probability. Every number she touches turns red. What is the probability that 6 is the last number to be colored?

Simulation of last numbers
スライド 1 / 3Simulation of last numbersThe chart shows the approximate frequencies after hundreds of trials.

When I simulate the walk many times and record the final number, all numbers from 1 through 11 appear about equally likely. That is surprising: one might initially expect 6, opposite the start, to be less likely than 1 or 11.

02

Wait for a neighbor

Reframe the question at the first visit to either neighbor of the target.

The key is to wait until the ladybug first reaches either neighbor of 6, namely 5 or 7. This eventually happens with probability one, so waiting for that moment does not change the probability of the final outcome.

Approaching a neighbor of 6
スライド 2 / 3Approaching a neighbor of 6From 7, reaching 5 without touching 6 makes 6 the last number.

Suppose she reaches 7 first. For 6 to be last, she must reach the still-untouched 5 by going around the other way before ever touching 6. That is a net ten steps clockwise before one step counterclockwise. Once she reaches 5 this way, every other number has been colored.

03

The same probability for all

The same random-walk problem applies to each possible last number.

Straighten the circle into a random walk: each step is +1 or −1 with equal probability, and the question is whether the walk reaches +10 before −1. We do not need to calculate this directly to finish the argument.

Nothing about the argument is special to 6. For 3, wait until the ladybug first reaches 2 or 4, then the same ten-steps-versus-one-step question applies. The probability is identical for every possible final number from 1 to 11, so each must have probability 1/11.

The same argument for 3
スライド 3 / 3The same argument for 3The diagram shows the ten-step route and the one-step forbidden direction.

同じチャンネルの記事

スライド 20 枚40:44EN
3Blue1Brown· 2026年10月16日Grant Sanderson: There's never been a better time to go into mathGrant Sanderson, Constantin Kogler · 3Blue1BrownStudents fear AI has solved mathematics. Grant Sanderson argues the opposite: even if machines prove theorems better than we do, the institution of math stays valuable—and this is a rare moment when newcomers can reshape it.MathematicsAI for scienceHuman-AI Collaboration+2
スライド 29 枚51:55EN
3Blue1Brown· 2026年9月18日The last IMO problem AI could not solveGrant Sanderson · 3Blue1BrownGrant Sanderson walks through IMO 2025 Problem 6 — a tiling puzzle that frontier models missed — and the visual patience it takes to prove a construction is optimal.MathematicsAI researchReasoning & test-time compute+2
0:55EN
3Blue1Brown· 2026年7月24日The 64 Sugar Cubes Puzzle: Six Equal DistancesA 4×4×4 block has three colors; prove that six same-colored pairs share a distance.MathematicsEducation
スライド2:25EN
3Blue1Brown· 2026年6月12日How Shannon Measured the Entropy of EnglishA guessing game helped Claude Shannon estimate how much information English text contains, and why prediction is central to compression.MathematicsAI History
スライド1:02EN
3Blue1Brown· 2026年6月10日A Robot Walk and the Puzzle of Optimal Binary EncodingHow few bits does it take to send directions that occur with unequal frequencies?MathematicsScience Communication
スライド 4 枚32:19EN
3Blue1Brown· 2026年6月7日Reinventing Entropy: Why Prediction Helps Compress LanguageA robot’s movement code leads from prefix-free encoding to Shannon information and the entropy of language.MathematicsScience Communication