Ace Computer-Use Agent: Fast Desktop and Browser Demonstrations

Matthew Berman reviews General Agents’ examples and reported click accuracy and latency, while noting he has not yet tested Ace himself.

MBMatthew Berman登壇者 · Forward Future
チャンネル
Matthew Berman
公開日
2025年4月4日
動画
7:33
読了時間
2 分
スライド
3
原文
英語
YouTube で開く
スクロールすると動画は右下に小さくなって再生を続けます。字幕は閲覧言語に合わせて切り替わります。
閲覧言語2 言語で読めます
この記事はまだ日本語に翻訳されていないため、英語の原文を表示しています。
要約

30 秒でわかる

Matthew Berman examines General Agents’ Ace computer-use launch, including demonstrations across macOS, Chrome, Premiere and HubSpot. He highlights the reported speed and behavior-based training, while distinguishing company demonstrations and benchmarks from his own future testing.

  1. 1Cross-app workflowsExamples include sharing an image and compressing, uploading and sharing files.
  2. 2Flight and contact tasksThe agent navigates a flight search and enters contacts in a demonstration labeled 2× speed.
  3. 3Reported benchmarksThe company compares click accuracy and action latency, not end-to-end reliability across every task.
  4. 4Behavior-based trainingThe company describes learning from recordings and input logs of people performing tasks.

ポイント

  1. Ace demonstrations show desktop and browser workflows including file sharing, editing and flight search.
  2. The contact-entry demonstration is labeled 2× speed, while other examples are labeled 1×.
  3. The company reports click accuracy and action-prediction latency under its chosen benchmark conditions.
  4. General Agents says it trains on recorded behavior such as screen, mouse and keyboard activity.
  5. Berman had not independently tested Ace at the time of the video.
全文

チャプターごとに整えた全文を読む

文字起こしのみ
01

Fast computer-use demonstrations

Berman introduces Ace and reviews browser and desktop tasks. He notes that he has not tested the product himself.

General Agents has shown Ace, a computer-use agent that operates a browser and desktop applications. The launch demonstrations look exceptionally fast to me, especially compared with the slow, error-prone computer-use agents I have tried. I have not yet tested Ace myself, so my assessment is based on the company’s examples and reported benchmarks.

In one demonstration, Ace finds a dog image in Chrome and shares it through iMessage. Another compresses files on macOS, uploads the archive to Google Drive and shares the link. The company labels these examples as running at normal speed.

The demonstrations extend beyond the browser. In Premiere, Ace slows a clip, splits it and starts an MP4 export. The attraction is that a person can describe a multistep task and let the agent operate the relevant interface, rather than manually performing each click.

02

Tasks and reported benchmarks

The examples include flight research and contact entry. Charts report click accuracy and action-prediction latency.

Flight-search demonstration
スライド 1 / 3Flight-search demonstrationThe agent navigates a date picker in Google Flights in a video labeled 1× speed.

A flight-search example navigates Google Flights to find a trip from San Francisco to New York. Another adds spreadsheet contacts to HubSpot one by one; that demonstration is labeled 2× speed. These examples show a range of tasks, but they do not establish performance across all real-world situations.

Reported click accuracy
スライド 2 / 3Reported click accuracyThe company compares correct left-click predictions across models.

The company’s chart compares correct click predictions, with Ace Control Medium near 80% in the displayed test. Its latency chart reports roughly 324 milliseconds for Ace Control Small and 533 milliseconds for Medium, versus about 6.4 seconds for Operator. These are reported benchmark results for particular conditions, not a complete measure of end-to-end task reliability.

Reported action-prediction latency
スライド 3 / 3Reported action-prediction latencyThe chart compares latency for Ace models and other systems under the displayed test.
03

Training and more examples

General Agents describes behavior-based training. Further demonstrations cover booking, issue creation and system settings.

General Agents describes training Ace on behavior rather than only text and images. According to the company, screen recordings and mouse and keyboard logs can provide examples of how people use familiar tools. I find the idea promising, but I want to see how it performs outside the demonstrations.

Further examples show Ace navigating an Airbnb booking flow and turning an error traceback into a GitHub issue. Another changes macOS appearance to dark mode and enables Game Center. The company is offering a research preview; at the time of this video I have requested access and plan to test it independently.

同じチャンネルの記事

スライド 6 枚25:50EN
MBMatthew Berman· 2026年10月24日Kimi K3.1 Pro Tested: Strong 3D Demos, Uneven Results and Competitive PricingMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests the open-weight model on coding, 3D rendering and visual explanations, then compares benchmark results and prices.Open-weight modelsBenchmarksAI cost & performance+1
スライド 2 枚32:20EN
MBMatthew Berman· 2026年10月23日Who Is Local AI For? The Costs, Trade-offs and a Hybrid FutureMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman weighs data control and independence against hardware cost, setup complexity and inference speed.Local inferenceOpen-weight modelsAI cost & performance+1
45:08EN
MBMatthew Berman· 2026年10月21日Sam Altman on AI Discovery, Consciousness, Compute and a Human-Centered FutureMatthew Berman, Sam Altman · Forward FutureIn a conversation with Matthew Berman, Altman discusses scientific progress, personal assistants, recursive self-improvement and the importance of human agency.AI for sciencePersonal agentsConsciousness+2
スライド 5 枚12:14EN
MBMatthew Berman· 2026年10月14日Gemini 4 Argon Tested: 3D Demos, a Spreadsheet Prototype and Benchmark ResultsMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests Google’s model on games and visual projects, then compares reported coding and agent benchmarks.GeminiBenchmarksコーディングエージェント+1
スライド 5 枚10:36EN
MBMatthew Berman· 2026年10月13日Meta Muse Wonder Tested: Strong Benchmarks, Mixed Demos and Quota FrictionMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests Meta’s models on browser demos and reviews their published benchmark scores, availability and cost.モデルと学習BenchmarksAI cost & performance+1
スライド 2 枚17:37EN
MBMatthew Berman· 2026年10月10日AI Coding, Game Mashups and the Value of Human TasteMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman explains decompilation and game mashups, then argues that iterative AI coding changes software and creativity.コーディングエージェントSoftware engineeringCreativity+1