A Fruit-Fly Connectome, Online Simulations and Questions About Experience

Matthew Berman shows playful simulated-fly demonstrations and asks whether a future complete simulation could suffer. A neural wiring map and those demonstrations do not establish a conscious digital animal.

MBMatthew BermanPresenta · Forward Future
Canal
Matthew Berman
Publicado
21 sept 2026
Vídeo
0:37
Lectura
2 min
Diapositivas
2
Original
inglés
Abrir en YouTube
Al desplazarte, el vídeo se reduce a la esquina inferior derecha y sigue reproduciéndose. Los subtítulos siguen tu idioma de lectura.
Idioma de lecturaDisponible en 2 idiomas
Este artículo aún no está en español, así que se muestra el original en inglés.
RESUMEN

En 30 segundos

In this September 2026 short, Matthew Berman describes a newly mapped fruit-fly nervous system, shows virtual flies performing human-like activities and asks whether a fully simulated animal would be real or could suffer. Those are philosophical and scientific questions, not conclusions established by the clips. Google Research, HHMI Janelia and collaborators published a male fruit-fly brain and central-nervous-system connectome. It is a map of anatomical connections, not a complete physiological reproduction; demonstrations may add software-defined inputs, outputs and controls.

  1. 1A mapped nervous systemThe 2026 male fly map was produced by a collaboration, not Google alone. A connectome records neural connections rather than a fully functioning animal.
  2. 2Online demonstrationsBerman shows animated flies in games and human activities; the video does not establish their biological fidelity or control methods.
  3. 3The ethical questionBerman asks whether future full simulations could be real or suffer. Neither consciousness nor suffering is demonstrated by these clips.

Conclusiones

  1. The 2026 male fruit-fly connectome is a collaborative anatomical map involving Google Research, HHMI Janelia and other researchers.
  2. A wiring diagram alone does not reproduce every biological state, sensory process or behavior of a living fly.
  3. Virtual blackjack, driving and other clips are demonstrations; the video does not verify how each is controlled or whether it reproduces real fly behavior.
  4. Whether any particular simulation could have subjective experience or suffer remains an open question.
TEXTO COMPLETO

Lee el texto editado por capítulos

Solo la transcripción
01

A fly map and simulated behavior

Berman introduces a fruit-fly connectome and shows a montage of virtual-fly activities. A map and a simulation are different objects, and each demo requires its own validation.

Fruit-fly nervous-system map
DIAPOSITIVA 1 / 2Fruit-fly nervous-system mapThe visual depicts a neural map; an anatomical connectome alone is not a complete living brain simulation.
A virtual fly at a blackjack table
DIAPOSITIVA 2 / 2A virtual fly at a blackjack tableThe scene is a software demonstration and does not establish human-like understanding or subjective experience.

Matthew Berman shows virtual fruit flies in playful online demonstrations and connects them to a newly mapped nervous system. In September 2026, [Google Research described a collaboration with HHMI Janelia, researchers in Cambridge and others](https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/research/male-fruit-fly-brain-map/) mapping the brain and central nervous system of an adult male fruit fly, with more than 166,000 neurons. It is a collaborative connectome, not work by Google alone.

A connectome is an anatomical wiring map of neurons and their connections. It does not by itself specify every neuron’s physiology, the animal’s body and environment, or a complete reproduction of its behavior. The male nervous-system map discussed here is distinct from the earlier [FlyWire adult female brain connectome](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07968-y); a simulation using one should not automatically be described as using the other.

Berman’s montage depicts flies playing blackjack, smoking a hookah, cutting a kebab, driving, solving a Rubik’s Cube and playing a video game. These are virtual scenes, not evidence that a biological fruit fly can perform those human tasks. Implementations can use developer-designed mappings between game inputs, simulated neural activity and controls; the short does not document or validate the mechanism behind each clip.

02

Could a simulation have experience?

Berman asks whether a hypothetical fully simulated animal or human would be real and whether a fly simulation could suffer. These questions remain unresolved.

Berman asks whether a hypothetical fully simulated fly—and, further in the future, a simulated cat, dog, monkey or person—would be real, and whether such a fly might be suffering. The current wiring map and entertaining animations do not establish a complete simulation or show subjective experience. Whether a particular simulation could be conscious or suffer is an open scientific and philosophical question.

Más de este canal

12 diapositivas34:21EN
Matthew Berman· 27 oct 2026Matthew Berman Examines Anthropic’s IPO Filing, AI Growth and GovernanceMatthew Berman, Sam Altman · Forward FutureThe presenter reviews the S-1’s financial metrics, compute strategy and voting structure while questioning the tension between rapid AI development and safety.AnthropicAI SafetyIA empresarial+2
0:26EN
Matthew Berman· 25 oct 2026Sam Altman on Human Values and Problem-Solving in an AI WorldSam Altman · OpenAIIn a short interview excerpt, Altman considers the enjoyment of solving hard problems and the human role in interpreting results.Human-AI CollaborationFuture of WorkAI Strategy
2 diapositivas0:36EN
Matthew Berman· 25 oct 2026Kimi K3.1 and a Rubik’s Cube Solver DemonstrationMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman shows a scrambled virtual cube being solved and gives the Kimi K3.1 test a favorable assessment.EvaluacionesAgentes de programaciónOpen-weight models
2 diapositivas0:21EN
Matthew Berman· 24 oct 2026An AI-Generated Kimi Benchmark Chart Used Invented ScoresMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman asks for a graph of Kimi K3.1 Pro benchmarks, then discovers that the displayed figures are illustrative placeholders.BenchmarksEvaluacionesGenerative media
6 diapositivas25:50EN
Matthew Berman· 24 oct 2026Kimi K3.1 Pro Tested: Strong 3D Demos, Uneven Results and Competitive PricingMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests the open-weight model on coding, 3D rendering and visual explanations, then compares benchmark results and prices.Open-weight modelsBenchmarksAI cost & performance+1
2 diapositivas32:20EN
Matthew Berman· 23 oct 2026Who Is Local AI For? The Costs, Trade-offs and a Hybrid FutureMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman weighs data control and independence against hardware cost, setup complexity and inference speed.Local inferenceOpen-weight modelsAI cost & performance+1