Three Eras of AI Coding Agents: Tool Calls, Long Tasks, and Orchestration

Theo Browne uses three model releases to explain how he sees coding agents developing.

TBTheo BrowneSpeaker · Ping Labs
Channel
Theo - t3․gg
Published
Jul 10, 2026
Video
0:33
Read
1 min
Slides
1
Original
English
Open on YouTube
Scroll to read and the video shrinks to the bottom-right corner. Captions follow your reading language.
Reading languageAvailable in 2 languages
You're reading the original English.
SUMMARY

In 30 seconds

Theo Browne describes three eras of agentic coding through Sonnet 3.5, Opus 4.5 and Mythos 5. In his view, the progression runs from reliable tool calls to longer tasks and then to orchestrating and verifying delegated work.

  1. 1Tool callsSonnet 3.5 was not the first model with tool calls, but Theo found them reliable enough for daily coding work.
  2. 2Long-running workTheo says Opus 4.5 could work for longer without losing track of its task.
  3. 3OrchestrationHe describes Mythos 5 as a jump toward delegating parts of a task to other models and verifying their work.

Takeaways

  1. Theo associates Sonnet 3.5 with reliable tool calls for everyday coding.
  2. He sees Opus 4.5 as a step toward longer-running tasks.
  3. He associates Mythos 5 with breaking work up, delegating it and verifying the results.
FULL TEXT

Read the edited text by chapter

Transcript only
01

Three eras of coding agents

Theo connects three model releases with tool calling, long-running work and orchestration. This is his framework for understanding their progress.

I think of these as eras. Sonnet 3.5 represents the tool-call era: it was not the first model able to call tools, but, in my experience, it was the first to do so consistently and reliably enough for everyday coding.

Three stages of coding agents
SLIDE 1 / 1Three stages of coding agentsTheo’s slide pairs Sonnet 3.5 with tool calls, Opus 4.5 with long-running work, and Mythos 5 with orchestration.

Then came Opus 4.5, which could work on much longer-running tasks without losing track of what it was doing.

Mythos 5 feels like another jump, this time to orchestration. In my experience it understands not only the codebase but how to use other models: it can split up work, spawn additional agents, and have the results verified afterward when asked.

More from this channel

5 slides38:47EN
Theo - t3․gg· Oct 28, 2026Theo’s Long-Running Agent Experiments: Verification, Compute and CostTheo Browne · Ping LabsA skateboard game and two compiler projects show how repeated checks and flexible compute can sustain agent work—and how expensive those loops can become.Coding agentsAgent engineeringAI cost & performance+2
5 slides36:07EN
Theo - t3․gg· Oct 27, 2026Theo on Token Costs, Coding Agents, and the Price of AI CapabilityTheo Browne · Ping LabsA viral estimate of Lauren's AI spending prompts a closer look at cache pricing, benchmarks, and the changing work of coding agents.AI cost & performanceCoding agentsInference+1
5 slides30:37EN
Theo - t3․gg· Oct 26, 2026Theo’s Three Skills for Reviewing and Shipping with Coding AgentsTheo Browne · Ping LabsHow sol-loop, full-send and full-stop encode review, verification and different levels of merge authority.Agent skillsCoding agentsCode review & verification+2
2 slides0:43EN
Theo - t3․gg· Oct 23, 2026Theo Distinguishes Security Vulnerabilities from Active AttacksTheo Browne · Ping LabsA short explanation of why disclosed software flaws and reported attacks are different kinds of security news.CybersecuritySoftware engineering
6 slides29:22EN
Theo - t3․gg· Oct 22, 2026Theo on Security Vulnerabilities, Stolen API Keys and AITheo Browne · Ping LabsA look at the gap between vulnerability disclosure and patching, and a speculative account of why stolen inference keys may be valuable.CybersecurityAI securitySoftware engineering+1
4 slides31:13EN
Theo - t3․gg· Oct 20, 2026Theo on Why Smarter Models Help More Than DevelopersTheo Browne · Ping LabsFrom game modifications to compiler experiments, Theo revisits his assumptions about who benefits from more capable AI.Coding agentsDeveloper productivityHuman-AI Collaboration+1