Three Ways to Define an Ellipse

Stretch a circle, draw with a taut string, or slice a cone: why do the constructions produce the same family of curves?

Channel
3Blue1Brown
Published
Jan 19, 2024
Video
0:51
Read
1 min
Slides
3
Original
English
Open on YouTube
Scroll to read and the video shrinks to the bottom-right corner. Captions follow your reading language.
Reading languageAvailable in 2 languages
You're reading the original English.
SUMMARY

In 30 seconds

This short 3Blue1Brown video introduces three geometric constructions of an ellipse and asks why they agree. It points to a longer companion video for the proof rather than presenting one here.

  1. 1Stretch a circleChanging the scale in one direction creates an ellipse.
  2. 2Use a stringTrace with a pencil while keeping a loop around two fixed points taut.
  3. 3Slice a coneA suitably angled plane intersects a cone in an ellipse.

Takeaways

  1. Stretching a circle along one axis produces an ellipse.
  2. A taut string looped around two fixed points provides another construction.
  3. An appropriately angled plane cuts a cone in an ellipse.
  4. The short raises the equivalence question; the proof appears in the linked full video.
FULL TEXT

Read the edited text by chapter

Transcript only
01

Three constructions

The presenter describes stretching a circle, using a string and cutting a cone.

Stretching a circle
SLIDE 1 / 3Stretching a circleAn ellipse can be obtained by changing scale along one axis.

There are at least three geometric ways to define an ellipse. One is to take a circle and stretch it in one direction.

The string construction
SLIDE 2 / 3The string constructionA pencil traces a curve while a loop of string remains taut around two fixed points.

Another is the two-thumbtack construction: loop a string around two fixed thumbtacks and trace with a pencil while keeping the string taut. A third is to cut a cone with a plane at an appropriate angle.

A conic section
SLIDE 3 / 3A conic sectionA plane cuts through a cone at an angle.
02

Why do they agree?

The short asks why the same curves arise and refers viewers to a longer proof.

Why should these three very different constructions give precisely the same family of curves, rather than merely similar-looking ovals? This short poses the question; its description links to the full video, which explains the cone-and-string equivalence.

More from this channel

20 slides40:44EN
3Blue1Brown· Oct 16, 2026Grant Sanderson: There's never been a better time to go into mathGrant Sanderson, Constantin Kogler · 3Blue1BrownStudents fear AI has solved mathematics. Grant Sanderson argues the opposite: even if machines prove theorems better than we do, the institution of math stays valuable—and this is a rare moment when newcomers can reshape it.MathematicsAI for scienceHuman-AI Collaboration+2
29 slides51:55EN
3Blue1Brown· Sep 18, 2026The last IMO problem AI could not solveGrant Sanderson · 3Blue1BrownGrant Sanderson walks through IMO 2025 Problem 6 — a tiling puzzle that frontier models missed — and the visual patience it takes to prove a construction is optimal.MathematicsAI researchReasoning & test-time compute+2
0:55EN
3Blue1Brown· Jul 24, 2026The 64 Sugar Cubes Puzzle: Six Equal DistancesA 4×4×4 block has three colors; prove that six same-colored pairs share a distance.MathematicsEducation
33:51EN
3Blue1Brown· Jul 16, 2026What Cross-Entropy Connects: Compression, Language Models and KL DivergenceGrant Sanderson · 3Blue1BrownGrant Sanderson builds cross-entropy from code lengths and uses it to explain next-token training and distillation.MathematicsMachine LearningFoundation Models+1
Slides2:25EN
3Blue1Brown· Jun 12, 2026How Shannon Measured the Entropy of EnglishA guessing game helped Claude Shannon estimate how much information English text contains, and why prediction is central to compression.MathematicsAI History
Slides1:02EN
3Blue1Brown· Jun 10, 2026A Robot Walk and the Puzzle of Optimal Binary EncodingHow few bits does it take to send directions that occur with unequal frequencies?MathematicsScience Communication