Erik and Martin Demaine on the Mathematics of Curved-Crease Sculpture

The MIT father-and-son collaborators turn paper folding into art and research, embedding puzzles and mathematical fonts in their sculpture Solve Me.

EDErik Demaine登壇者 · MITMDMartin Demaine登壇者 · MIT
チャンネル
Jane Street
公開日
2024年8月13日
動画
7:17
読了時間
3 分
スライド
3
原文
英語
YouTube で開く
スクロールすると動画は右下に小さくなって再生を続けます。字幕は閲覧言語に合わせて切り替わります。
閲覧言語2 言語で読めます
この記事はまだ日本語に翻訳されていないため、英語の原文を表示しています。
要約

30 秒でわかる

Origami theorists and artists Erik and Martin Demaine explain their collaborative process and the exchange between sculpture and mathematical research. Their work Solve Me, displayed at Jane Street in Hong Kong, combines intertwined curved-crease forms with mathematical puzzles and specially designed fonts.

  1. 1Art and mathematics feed each otherMaking a sculpture can lead to a new existence or generalization question; a mathematical result can become a physical artwork.
  2. 2Design, fold, improviseThe artists design and score sheets, then fold and assemble multiple pieces by hand without knowing the entire final form.
  3. 3A puzzle in paperSolve Me weaves its components into a form that makes them hard to count and invites viewers to investigate.
  4. 4Two mathematical fontsThe Tetris font uses seven pieces per letter, while each letter of the two-piece dissection font can be rearranged into a six-by-six square.

ポイント

  1. Origami sculpture can generate mathematical questions, and mathematical discoveries can inspire physical art.
  2. The Demaines design and score paper before folding and assembling pieces by hand, improvising as the three-dimensional form develops.
  3. Solve Me deliberately obscures how many pieces it contains and embeds mathematical problems, including unsolved ones.
  4. Its Tetris and two-piece dissection fonts turn letter design into geometric puzzles.
  5. Building the sculpture produced new questions that may guide future research.
トピックMathematicsDesign
全文

チャプターごとに整えた全文を読む

文字起こしのみ
01

Origami as art and research

Erik and Martin Demaine introduce their backgrounds and explain how mathematics and sculpture inspire one another.

Erik Demaine is an MIT computer science professor; his father Martin Demaine is an MIT researcher and artist in residence. Erik brings a background in mathematics and computing, Martin one in art and making. Together they describe themselves as both origami theorists and artists: they study how sheets fold and make intriguing sculptures from paper.

When the Demaines began studying origami mathematics, they were advised that it was a niche recreational subject and not a promising research area. They ignored the advice because the questions were too compelling. The mathematics of their curved-crease forms remains an active subject, with foundational existence questions still unproved.

Art and mathematics inspire each other in their work. Trying to build a sculpture can raise a mathematical question about whether a shape exists or how to generalize it. A mathematical result, in turn, can become a physical sculpture that people can appreciate beyond a screen.

02

Collaboration and making

Their process combines brainstorming, design and hand assembly with improvisation and a longstanding collaborative relationship.

Their process is often improvisational. One might add a few pieces and then the other adds more; the sculpture grows as they respond to each other and to the material. They may have several projects in progress at once, moving to another when stuck. Some remain unfinished, but still produce artistic or mathematical insights.

The Demaines credit their collaboration to communication that is honest and humorous, as well as deep trust. They have written hundreds of papers and made hundreds of sculptures together. Martin describes Erik as his best friend and their work as a shared undertaking.

They spend much of their time brainstorming what a piece should be. The process starts with a design on a sheet of paper, which is scored and folded; they repeat that to make multiple pieces and then assemble them into a three-dimensional sculpture. The assembly is improvised, and its outcome is not fully known in advance.

They use technology for much of the design, but insist on assembling the sculptures by hand. As with building blocks, they make adjustments while working and sometimes take a piece apart and start over.

03

The puzzles inside Solve Me

The sculpture hides mathematical problems and makes its pieces hard to distinguish. It incorporates Tetris and dissection fonts.

For a new piece, they discuss overlapping sheets and making dissection a theme, with mathematical problems incorporated into the design. They call the sculpture Solve Me, a reference to the 'eat me' and 'drink me' prompts in Alice in Wonderland. The finished work is displayed in Jane Street's Hong Kong office.

In many of their sculptures, a viewer can count the pieces. Solve Me is designed to make that difficult: the twisting and weaving patterns lead the eye through an intricate whole. The artists want viewers to wonder how it was made and whether it really is paper.

The Solve Me sculpture
スライド 1 / 3The Solve Me sculptureThe artists show the intertwined, printed curved-crease sculpture and an individual folded component.

The printed text hides mathematical problems the artists think about, including a couple that remain unsolved. Such problems lie on the frontier between what mathematicians know how to solve and what they do not yet know.

The sculpture incorporates two mathematical fonts the Demaines designed. In the Tetris font, each letter is made from all seven Tetris pieces. In the two-piece dissection font, each letter can be divided into two sets and rearranged into a six-by-six square.

Two-piece dissection font
スライド 2 / 3Two-piece dissection fontThe printed letter designs invite viewers to divide and rearrange each letter into a square.
Problems arranged as Tetris pieces
スライド 3 / 3Problems arranged as Tetris piecesThe sheet shows the mathematical problems arranged within a Tetris-inspired layout.

The layout of the problems also follows Tetris: bold outlines form the game pieces. One surprise for the artists was that the printing on the paper helped the piece shape itself, blending components into a complex form that makes them hard to distinguish.

04

New questions

The artists reflect on the unexpected geometry and new research problems that emerged from building the piece.

The Demaines say they could not have imagined these geometries when they first began folding paper. Building Solve Me generated new puzzles and mathematical problems that may guide future research. For them, the attraction of mathematics is how much remains unknown and open to discovery.

同じチャンネルの記事

1:48:29EN
JSJane Street· 2026年10月16日How AI Is Changing Programming: John Krazit and Ron MinskyRon Minsky, John Krazit · Jane StreetJane Street’s AI tooling lead and the Signals and Threads host examine agent infrastructure, security, code review and the changing experience of writing software.コーディングエージェントDeveloper productivity評価(Evals)+2
1:36:37EN
JSJane Street· 2026年9月23日Aaron Bauer on Teaching Software Engineering in the Age of AIRon Minsky, Aaron Bauer · Jane StreetHow learning goals, active practice and editor design shape engineering education when models can generate the code.AI in EducationSoftware engineeringEducation+2
スライド 9 枚1:05:45EN
JSJane Street· 2026年9月11日Cyrus Omar on Live Programming and a Computational Commons for Humans and AICyrus OmarA demonstration of Hazel shows how immediate feedback, structured collaboration and carefully scoped permissions could support people and AI agents working together.Programming LanguagesHuman-AI Collaboration開発ワークフローとテスト+2
1:25:00EN
JSJane Street· 2026年9月2日Eric Mannes on Turning Messy External Data Into Trading ResearchRon, Eric Mannes · Jane StreetFrom commodity futures and an Excel risk system to point-in-time datasets and AI, Eric Mannes explains the domain knowledge behind data engineering at Jane Street.Data quality & curation開発ワークフローとテストInvesting+2
スライド 7 枚1:16:29EN
JSJane Street· 2026年8月26日Grant Sanderson and Alok Puranik: Positional Encodings Through Group TheoryGrant Sanderson, Alok Puranik · 3Blue1BrownStarting with assumptions about attention, they derive matrix exponentials and connect rotations, decay and Jordan blocks to RoPE and ALiBi.Transformers & attentionMathematics機械学習の基礎+1
27:39EN
JSJane Street· 2026年8月21日3Blue1Brown and Jane Street on Trading, Machine Learning and CultureGrant Sanderson, Nitya, In Young, Craig, Alok · 3Blue1BrownGrant Sanderson talks with Jane Street colleagues about market making, shared compute, research and the paths that brought them to the firm.Machine LearningFintechCompany Culture+2