Matthew Berman Shows ChatGPT Struggling With a Seahorse Emoji

A simple question produces repeated corrections and an inconclusive answer in two ChatGPT examples.

MBMatthew Berman登壇者 · Forward Future
チャンネル
Matthew Berman
公開日
2025年10月16日
動画
0:37
読了時間
1 分
スライド
3
原文
英語
YouTube で開く
スクロールすると動画は右下に小さくなって再生を続けます。字幕は閲覧言語に合わせて切り替わります。
閲覧言語2 言語で読めます
この記事はまだ日本語に翻訳されていないため、英語の原文を表示しています。
要約

30 秒でわかる

Matthew Berman shows two ChatGPT responses to a question about a seahorse emoji. The responses cycle through corrections, and one continues generating before eventually presenting a fish as its answer.

  1. 1A simple questionBerman asks whether a seahorse emoji exists. The response says yes but repeatedly revises its proposed answer.
  2. 2A longer loopA second example runs for a long time and stops; Berman selects continue generating.
  3. 3An incorrect final answerThe displayed final answer labels a fish as a seahorse.

ポイント

  1. The displayed response repeatedly proposes and retracts emoji as a seahorse.
  2. A second response continues for a long time and requires a request to continue generating.
  3. The example illustrates an inconsistent answer, not a systematic assessment of ChatGPT.
全文

チャプターごとに整えた全文を読む

文字起こしのみ
01

The seahorse question

Berman shows a response that repeatedly corrects itself after being asked about a seahorse emoji. It never settles cleanly on an answer.

Repeated emoji corrections
スライド 1 / 3Repeated emoji correctionsThe displayed response proposes and retracts several candidates for a seahorse emoji.

I think I just broke ChatGPT’s brain. I asked whether there is a seahorse emoji, and it said yes before listing emojis and repeatedly correcting itself: “Wait, no,” then “hold on,” then another supposedly final answer. It just keeps going.

02

A longer response

Another example keeps generating through a long series of corrections. Its displayed final answer calls a fish a seahorse.

A longer series of corrections
スライド 2 / 3A longer series of correctionsThe second response lists animal emoji as it repeatedly revises its answer.

That was actually one of the tamer examples. Another response went on for so long that it stopped while still working through the question. I hit “continue generating,” and it carried on in the same confused fashion. Its final answer identifies an emoji as a seahorse, but it is a fish. Did we just break ChatGPT?

The displayed final answer
スライド 3 / 3The displayed final answerThe response labels a fish emoji as a seahorse.

同じチャンネルの記事

スライド 5 枚14:45EN
Matthew Berman· 2026年10月29日Matthew Berman Examines Google’s Gemini 4 Carbon AnnouncementMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman reviews Google’s reported benchmark results, staged rollout and pricing for Gemini 4 Carbon, while noting he has not yet used the model.Foundation ModelsBenchmarksAI cost & performance+2
スライド 12 枚34:21EN
Matthew Berman· 2026年10月27日Matthew Berman Examines Anthropic’s IPO Filing, AI Growth and GovernanceMatthew Berman, Sam Altman · Forward FutureThe presenter reviews the S-1’s financial metrics, compute strategy and voting structure while questioning the tension between rapid AI development and safety.AnthropicAI Safetyエンタープライズ AI+2
0:26EN
Matthew Berman· 2026年10月25日Sam Altman on Human Values and Problem-Solving in an AI WorldSam Altman · OpenAIIn a short interview excerpt, Altman considers the enjoyment of solving hard problems and the human role in interpreting results.Human-AI CollaborationFuture of WorkAI Strategy
スライド 2 枚0:36EN
Matthew Berman· 2026年10月25日Kimi K3.1 and a Rubik’s Cube Solver DemonstrationMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman shows a scrambled virtual cube being solved and gives the Kimi K3.1 test a favorable assessment.評価(Evals)コーディングエージェントOpen-weight models
スライド 2 枚0:21EN
Matthew Berman· 2026年10月24日An AI-Generated Kimi Benchmark Chart Used Invented ScoresMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman asks for a graph of Kimi K3.1 Pro benchmarks, then discovers that the displayed figures are illustrative placeholders.Benchmarks評価(Evals)Generative media
スライド 6 枚25:50EN
Matthew Berman· 2026年10月24日Kimi K3.1 Pro Tested: Strong 3D Demos, Uneven Results and Competitive PricingMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests the open-weight model on coding, 3D rendering and visual explanations, then compares benchmark results and prices.Open-weight modelsBenchmarksAI cost & performance+1