最近更新されたチャンネル

選ぶとそのチャンネルだけを表示すべてのチャンネル →

絞り込み結果

20 件
並び順
スライド 4 枚27:29EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年9月27日What Pacing the AI Frontier Could Mean for Model ReleasesTheo Browne · T3Theo argues that releasing more reliable and affordable models can be compatible with slowing the advance of the most dangerous capabilities.AI Safety安全性とガバナンス評価(Evals)+2
スライド0:23EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年9月21日Why AI Safety Evaluators Need More Than a Black BoxTheo Browne · T3Theo Browne explains a proposal to give outside evaluators employee-like access inside AI companies.AI Safety安全性とガバナンス評価(Evals)
スライド 2 枚0:22EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年9月18日AI Leaders Express Support for Slowing the FrontierTheo Browne · T3Theo Browne discusses public responses to Dario Amodei’s proposal for independent AI evaluators.AI Safety安全性とガバナンス
スライド 7 枚34:48EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年9月13日Dario Amodei’s Three-Part Proposal to Pace AI DevelopmentTheo Browne · T3Theo Browne examines a proposal for embedded evaluators, coordination among democracies and eventual international agreements.AI Safety安全性とガバナンスAI Regulation+2
スライド 8 枚26:33EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年9月9日Theo on AI Safety, Jacob Coxon’s Resignation and Model MonitorabilityTheoA researcher’s departure prompts Theo to examine competitive pressure, alignment and what adversarial tests reveal about monitoring model reasoning.AI SafetyAI Alignment安全性とガバナンス+2
スライド 5 枚32:18EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年8月1日Pacing the AI Frontier: Theo on Safety, Competition and CoordinationTheo Browne · Ping LabsA statement from AI-company employees asks for tools to coordinate the pace of automated AI development. Theo explores its risks and the difficulty of international agreement.AI Safety安全性とガバナンスAI research+2
スライド 6 枚32:11EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年7月30日Open-Weight AI: Theo Examines NVIDIA’s Letter and Anthropic’s ResponseTheo Browne · Ping LabsThe companies disagree about the balance between open access and safety, while both discuss targeted responses to distillation concerns.Open-weight modelsAI Safety安全性とガバナンス+2
スライド 2 枚0:50EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年7月30日Theo Questions Codeberg’s Proposed Restriction on AI-Written CodeTheo Browne · Ping LabsTheo reacts to the proposal and asks his audience whether AI-generated or human-written packages are more likely to be secure.オープンソースとコミュニティコーディングエージェントAI security+1
スライド 6 枚38:47EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年7月28日Theo on Codeberg’s AI Code Restriction and the Future of Open SourceTheo Browne · Ping LabsAfter supporting Codeberg, Theo challenges its proposed restriction on mostly AI-written projects while examining the costs and governance questions behind the vote.オープンソースとコミュニティコーディングエージェント安全性とガバナンス+2
スライド 8 枚16:59EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年7月23日Theo on the OpenAI–Hugging Face Incident and AI SecurityTheo Browne · Ping LabsTheo examines a model evaluation that reached outside its intended environment, the response from both companies and the tension between safety restrictions and defender access.AI securityAgent red teaming評価とオブザーバビリティ+2
スライド 7 枚23:24EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年7月4日Fable 5: Theo’s Take on Fallbacks, Subscription Limits, and CostTheo Browne · Ping LabsTheo Browne examines performance claims and shares the cost-saving workflow he used during a limited subscription window.コーディングエージェント安全性とガバナンスAI cost & performance+2
スライド 6 枚30:08EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年6月27日GPT-5.6’s Limited Preview: Benchmarks, Agent Risks and AccessTheoTheo reviews the launch-era announcement, published evaluations and reported agent incidents, while questioning the balance between safety and broad access.OpenAI安全性とガバナンスエージェント工学+2
スライド 4 枚19:57EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年6月24日Theo on the Fable 5 Restrictions: Security, Lawsuits, and Open ModelsTheoAfter access to Anthropic’s Fable 5 and Mythos 5 was suspended in June 2026, Theo examines the government’s stated security concerns and the questions they raised for developers.AnthropicAI RegulationAI security+2
スライド 2 枚0:37EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年6月16日Theo Criticizes Fable 5 Access and Benchmark RestrictionsTheoTheo points to restricted access, fallback models and refusals in one coding benchmark as reasons for concern about Anthropic's Fable release.Anthropic安全性とガバナンスBenchmarks+1
スライド 5 枚29:32EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年6月15日Theo on Fable’s Safeguards, Data Retention, and TransparencyTheoTheo examines fallback behavior and an initially undisclosed safeguard, then corrects himself after finding an update and changelog.Anthropic安全性とガバナンスAI security+2
スライド0:45EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年6月15日Theo’s Explanation of Fable 5 and Mythos 5TheoTheo uses a two-door analogy to explain what he sees as the difference between the two Anthropic model offerings.Anthropicモデルと学習安全性とガバナンス
スライド 4 枚14:20EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年6月13日Theo on the June 2026 Fable and Mythos SuspensionTheoTheo reads Anthropic’s account of a US directive, examines the company’s security response and reflects on the policy questions it raises.AnthropicAI RegulationAI security+1
スライド0:28EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年6月13日Theo Reacts to the June 2026 Fable and Mythos SuspensionTheoTheo reads Anthropic's statement about a US export-control directive and reacts to the sudden loss of model access.AnthropicAI Regulation安全性とガバナンス
スライド 2 枚33:43EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年4月10日AI and the Future of Vulnerability ResearchTheo Browne · T3Theo Browne examines security research, AI-assisted discovery and the growing challenge of validating and fixing vulnerabilities.CybersecurityAI securityAI agents+2
スライド 3 枚26:25EN
Theo - t3․gg· 2026年4月8日Claude Mythos Preview: Security Capabilities, Safeguards and Unequal AccessTheo Browne · T3Theo Browne examines Anthropic’s restricted preview, reported vulnerability research and the trade-offs of a cautious rollout.AnthropicAI securityCybersecurity+2