Using OpenClaw to Research and Organize Video Ideas

RÉSUMÉ

En 30 secondes

In this February 2026 short, Matthew Berman shows an OpenClaw assistant researching a proposed video and adding a task to Asana. The accompanying prompt describes a broader workflow for research, duplicate checks and concise production briefs; its similarity threshold is a configuration choice, not a guarantee of accuracy.

1Start with an ideaBerman asks his assistant to find sources and visual material for a proposed video.
2Create a production taskThe assistant adds a card to an Asana video pipeline with researched material.
3Research and deduplicateThe description supplies a longer prompt for searching sources, comparing past ideas and creating a brief.

À retenir

A chat message can trigger research for articles, videos, posts and visual material related to an idea.
The example creates an Asana task containing research links and a production outline.
The supplied prompt proposes similarity-based duplicate checks, but the short does not establish their accuracy.

ThèmesAgents Content Strategy

TEXTE INTÉGRAL

Lire le texte remanié, chapitre par chapitre

Afficher la transcription

Transcription seule

From an idea to a task

Berman demonstrates research from a chat request and shows the resulting Asana task. He shares a broader prompt for a content pipeline.

My team shares articles that might make interesting videos. In this OpenClaw example, I tell my assistant that an article is a video idea and ask it to find relevant articles, videos, posts and graphs I could show alongside it.

DIAPOSITIVE 1 / 1Research material in the video pipelineThe task contains links and proposed visual assets gathered for the video idea.

When the research finishes, the assistant creates a card in my Asana video pipeline. I open the card to show source material and a video outline assembled from the article; the short shows a result, not a systematic assessment of source quality.

The video description provides a broader content-idea prompt: research a topic, compare it with past ideas using semantic and keyword similarity, and create a concise task if it passes a duplicate check. Its proposed 40% cutoff is a chosen rule and can produce false matches or miss duplicates, so the output still needs review.