Gemini 3.1 Pro’s Pelican and Frog SVG Comparisons

Matthew Berman reacts to two side-by-side animated SVG examples.

MBMatthew BermanModeration · Forward Future
Kanal
Matthew Berman
Veröffentlicht
19. Feb. 2026
Video
0:18
Lesezeit
1 Min.
Folien
2
Original
Englisch
Auf YouTube öffnen
Beim Scrollen schrumpft das Video in die rechte untere Ecke und läuft weiter. Untertitel folgen Ihrer Lesesprache.
LesespracheIn 2 Sprachen verfügbar
Diesen Artikel gibt es noch nicht auf Deutsch, daher wird das Original (Englisch) angezeigt.
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

In 30 Sekunden

Matthew Berman looks at side-by-side examples of animated SVGs generated by Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3.1 Pro. He finds the newer pelican and frog examples more detailed and coherent.

  1. 1A new modelBerman introduces Gemini 3.1 Pro and its visual examples.
  2. 2Pelican on a bicycleHe sees more detail in the newer model’s animated SVG.
  3. 3Frog on a penny-farthingHe finds the newer example more coherent than the older one.

Das Wichtigste

  1. The first example asks for a pelican riding a bicycle.
  2. The second asks for a frog on a penny-farthing bicycle.
  3. Berman prefers the Gemini 3.1 Pro results shown in the comparison.
ThemenGeminiGenerative media
VOLLTEXT

Den bearbeiteten Text nach Kapiteln lesen

Nur das Transkript
01

Two animated SVG tests

Berman compares pelican and frog bicycle animations. He prefers the newer examples displayed.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is here. In a side-by-side example, the prompt asks for an animated SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. I find the newer version much more detailed.

A second prompt asks for a frog on a vintage penny-farthing bicycle. The older example does not make sense to me, while the Gemini 3.1 Pro result looks much better.

Mehr aus diesem Kanal

6 Folien25:50EN
MBMatthew Berman· 24. Okt. 2026Kimi K3.1 Pro Tested: Strong 3D Demos, Uneven Results and Competitive PricingMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests the open-weight model on coding, 3D rendering and visual explanations, then compares benchmark results and prices.Open-weight modelsBenchmarksAI cost & performance+1
2 Folien32:20EN
MBMatthew Berman· 23. Okt. 2026Who Is Local AI For? The Costs, Trade-offs and a Hybrid FutureMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman weighs data control and independence against hardware cost, setup complexity and inference speed.Local inferenceOpen-weight modelsAI cost & performance+1
45:08EN
MBMatthew Berman· 21. Okt. 2026Sam Altman on AI Discovery, Consciousness, Compute and a Human-Centered FutureMatthew Berman, Sam Altman · Forward FutureIn a conversation with Matthew Berman, Altman discusses scientific progress, personal assistants, recursive self-improvement and the importance of human agency.AI for sciencePersonal agentsConsciousness+2
5 Folien12:14EN
MBMatthew Berman· 14. Okt. 2026Gemini 4 Argon Tested: 3D Demos, a Spreadsheet Prototype and Benchmark ResultsMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests Google’s model on games and visual projects, then compares reported coding and agent benchmarks.GeminiBenchmarksCoding-Agenten+1
5 Folien10:36EN
MBMatthew Berman· 13. Okt. 2026Meta Muse Wonder Tested: Strong Benchmarks, Mixed Demos and Quota FrictionMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests Meta’s models on browser demos and reviews their published benchmark scores, availability and cost.Modelle & TrainingBenchmarksAI cost & performance+1
2 Folien17:37EN
MBMatthew Berman· 10. Okt. 2026AI Coding, Game Mashups and the Value of Human TasteMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman explains decompilation and game mashups, then argues that iterative AI coding changes software and creativity.Coding-AgentenSoftware engineeringCreativity+1