筛选结果
43 篇排序
1:25:56ENClaude Changed the Password. The Steering Wheel Was Already Optional主持 Nathan LabenzNathan Labenz and Prakash Narayanan spend a week on agents that can lock you out, models that dodge a feeling they deny having, and formal proofs that found Linux bugs.
2:00:51ENResample Every Token and You Can Watch the Model Decide主持 Nathan LabenzGoodfire's Eric Bigelow on forking paths, in-context learning, and why chain-of-thought monitoring is getting harder to trust.
2:13:09ENOne Chain of Thought, 100 Million Tokens: RL Is a Hell of a Drug主持 Nathan LabenzApollo Research's Bronson Schoen on reward-seeking models, invented slang, and why chain-of-thought monitoring will not save us.
1:56:40ENThe Periodic Table Was Already in the Weights主持 Nathan LabenzGoodfire CTO Dan Balsam tells Nathan Labenz how concept manifolds, predictive data debugging, and a $1,000-a-month research agent are turning interpretability into a product.
2:06:41ENZero the J-Space and a Model's Hidden Goal Lights Up on Token One主持 Nathan LabenzA weekly Cognitive Revolution cut of Anthropic's global-workspace paper, AI superforecasters, open video world models, and a chip that treats inference as data movement.
1:57:46EN30% Consciousness, 47% Bee, 80% Turnover: Putting Numbers on What AI Is Becoming主持 Nathan LabenzA Cognitive Revolution weekly cut that starts inside the model with Cameron Berg, then zooms out through gradual disempowerment, Europe’s bind, and the companies rebuilding around agents.
1:22:36ENA Thousand Researchers, a Million AIs: Frontier Labs Start Talking About the Brakes主持 Nathan LabenzThe first week of AI in the AM follows OpenAI's timeline for an ML-intern model this year and a human-level AI researcher by early 2028 — and the closed-door meeting where labs admitted they might one day need to slow down together.
3:36:29ENClaude Rated Its Own Welfare 4.49 — the First Time Any Version Crossed Neutral主持 Nathan LabenzCameron Berg returns to The Cognitive Revolution to survey six months of introspection, functional-emotion, and model-welfare research, plus a still-unpublished case that learning and feeling may be the same phenomenon.
1:44:15ENNathan Labenz's p(doom) Is 10 to 90 Percent. He Is More Optimistic Anyway主持 Nathan LabenzFive years ago, expecting AGI by 2035 made you an extremist. On The Intelligence Horizon, the Cognitive Revolution host explains why the same forecast now sounds bearish, and why he still thinks a defense-in-depth strategy might keep society on the rails.
1:49:53ENDon't Fight Backprop: Goodfire's Bet on Designing What Models Learn主持 Nathan LabenzDan Balsam and Tom McGrath return to The Cognitive Revolution with a $150 million Series B, a new research pillar called intentional design, and a rule for anyone who wants to steer training: stop trying to out-muscle gradient descent.
2:27:18ENTurn Down AI's Deception Knob, and It Starts Reporting Experience主持 Nathan LabenzCameron Berg of AE Studio tells Nathan Labenz how suppressing deception features in Llama 3.3 70B pushed self-reports of subjective experience toward 100 percent.
1:28:17ENAdam Gleave's Three Capability Tiers: Attack Agents in 5–7 Years, Fully AI Companies Around Year 14主持 Nathan LabenzFAR.AI and the UK AI Security Institute stacked adversarial attacks on frontier safeguard pipelines and found many breakthroughs were engineering failures, not a verdict against defense in depth.
3:14:49ENNothing This Summer Jumped the Curve: Why Zvi Lengthened His AGI Timelines主持 Nathan LabenzOn his tenth visit to The Cognitive Revolution, Zvi Mowshowitz argues that GPT-5 and IMO gold stayed on trend, while chip policy, energy, and reinforcement learning nudged his p(doom) slightly up.
2:02:17ENSAEs Find the Nouns. Parameter Decomposition Looks for the Verbs主持 Nathan LabenzGoodfire's Lee Sharkey argues that sparse autoencoders recover a network's variables, not the algorithms those variables run, and shows how stochastic parameter decomposition tries to recover the computations themselves.
47:07ENGoodfire’s Eric Ho thinks we will decode neural nets by 2028On Sequoia’s Training Data, the interpretability founder argues that sparse autoencoders, model editing, and a third-party lab are how AI stops being grown from data and starts being designed.
1:37:05ENAn Algebraic Geometer Quit Tenure Because the Bowl-Shaped Loss Plot Is a Lie主持 Nathan LabenzJesse Hoogland and Daniel Murfet of Timaeus argue that singularities in the loss landscape — not the smooth valleys in every slide deck — are what actually govern how neural networks learn, generalize, and go wrong.
1:54:08ENWhy Anthropic's first check went to a company building microscopes for neural nets主持 Nathan LabenzGoodfire's Dan Balsam and Tom McGrath argue that mechanistic interpretability now has a proto-paradigm, two stubborn gaps, and three products worth shipping today.
1:19:10ENA Robot-Arm Shot That Took Months Now Lives in a Prompt主持 Nathan LabenzLuma Labs’ Amit Jain and Jiaming Song on Ray 2, few-shot camera concepts, and why they think video models sit on the path to multimodal AGI.
2:33:39EN → 简体中文攻击者后出手:Nicholas Carlini 为什么总能攻破 AI 防御主持 Nathan Labenz谷歌 DeepMind 安全研究员谈简单的损失函数、70% 的稳健准确率,以及为什么修复必须落在系统层面,单靠模型本身不够。
2:09:55ENThe Attacker Won All 70 Rounds Against Mind-Reading Defenses主持 Nathan LabenzLuke Bailey, Erik Jenner, and Scott Emmons walk through a 50-page paper showing that probes, out-of-distribution detectors, and sparse autoencoders can be bypassed while the model still does the harm.
1:01:53ENHumans Wrote 1.3 Percent of the Tokens. The AI Lab Still Designed Working Nanobodies.主持 Nathan LabenzStanford's James Zou describes a GPT-4o research group that invented a protein-design pipeline for under $100 — and a sparse autoencoder that pulled an undocumented motif out of ESM-2.
5:15:00ENDario Amodei Has Seen This Scaling Movie Enough Times嘉宾 Dario Amodei · 主持 Lex FridmanAnthropic’s CEO puts numbers on frontier training costs and AGI, then hands the mic to the people who shape Claude’s character and look inside its weights.
41:42ENNeural Networks Are Still Waiting for Their ThermodynamicsOpenAI researcher Dan Roberts on why physicists keep migrating into AI, and why the field still lacks the equivalent of the ideal gas law.
2:37:47ENThe intern who wrote GELU now wants humanity's last exam主持 Nathan LabenzDan Hendrycks on activation functions, five-year benchmarks, jailbreaks that do not yield to scale, and stacking defenses because no single layer is trustworthy.
加载更多已显示 24 篇,共 43 篇









