Comparing Three Local Coding Models

Matthew Berman introduces a sponsored comparison of DeepSeek Coder V2, Yi-Coder and Qwen Coder running on a workstation.

MBMatthew Berman진행자 · Forward Future
채널
Matthew Berman
게시일
2024년 11월 6일
영상
0:28
읽기
1분
원문
영어
YouTube에서 열기
스크롤하면 영상이 오른쪽 아래로 작아져 계속 재생됩니다. 자막은 읽기 언어를 따릅니다.
읽기 언어2개 언어로 읽을 수 있음
이 글은 아직 한국어 번역이 없어 영어 원문으로 표시합니다.
요약

30초 요약

In this short video, Matthew Berman says he ran three coding-focused models locally on a Dell Precision workstation and directs viewers to a longer comparison. The clip identifies the candidates but does not reveal a winner or report benchmark results. Berman discloses a partnership with Dell.

  1. 1Three models, one local testBerman introduces three coding models that he says he ran locally on a Dell workstation.
  2. 2Results are in the full videoHe names the models and points to a longer comparison; this short itself does not name the best model.
  3. 3Dell partnershipBerman discloses that Dell partnered with him and powered the models.

핵심 정리

  1. The short introduces DeepSeek Coder V2, Yi-Coder and Qwen Coder as candidates for local coding tests.
  2. Berman says he ran the models on a Dell Precision workstation and discloses a Dell partnership.
  3. The clip does not provide the comparison's results or identify a winner.
전문

챕터별로 다듬은 전문 읽기

원본 자막만 보기
01

The local coding comparison

Berman introduces the three candidates and the workstation used for his test.

Matthew Berman says he tested three coding-focused models head-to-head, running them locally on a Dell Precision workstation. He describes the models as open source; the specific weights and license terms should be checked individually.

02

Watch the full comparison

The short asks which model is best but directs viewers elsewhere for results and discloses a Dell partnership.

The candidates are DeepSeek Coder V2, Yi-Coder and Qwen Coder. Berman asks viewers which they think is best and points to the full comparison, but this short does not state the winner or present results. He discloses that Dell partnered with him and supplied the computing platform.

같은 채널의 다른 글

슬라이드 6장25:50EN
MBMatthew Berman· 2026년 10월 24일Kimi K3.1 Pro Tested: Strong 3D Demos, Uneven Results and Competitive PricingMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests the open-weight model on coding, 3D rendering and visual explanations, then compares benchmark results and prices.Open-weight modelsBenchmarksAI cost & performance+1
슬라이드 2장32:20EN
MBMatthew Berman· 2026년 10월 23일Who Is Local AI For? The Costs, Trade-offs and a Hybrid FutureMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman weighs data control and independence against hardware cost, setup complexity and inference speed.Local inferenceOpen-weight modelsAI cost & performance+1
45:08EN
MBMatthew Berman· 2026년 10월 21일Sam Altman on AI Discovery, Consciousness, Compute and a Human-Centered FutureMatthew Berman, Sam Altman · Forward FutureIn a conversation with Matthew Berman, Altman discusses scientific progress, personal assistants, recursive self-improvement and the importance of human agency.AI for sciencePersonal agentsConsciousness+2
0:32EN
MBMatthew Berman· 2026년 10월 21일Sam Altman on the Continuing Demand for Software WorkSam Altman, Matthew Berman · OpenAIIn a short interview excerpt, Altman says demand for software may be larger than expected even as AI changes how it is made.Future of WorkSoftware engineering코딩 에이전트
슬라이드 5장12:14EN
MBMatthew Berman· 2026년 10월 14일Gemini 4 Argon Tested: 3D Demos, a Spreadsheet Prototype and Benchmark ResultsMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests Google’s model on games and visual projects, then compares reported coding and agent benchmarks.GeminiBenchmarks코딩 에이전트+1
슬라이드 5장10:36EN
MBMatthew Berman· 2026년 10월 13일Meta Muse Wonder Tested: Strong Benchmarks, Mixed Demos and Quota FrictionMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests Meta’s models on browser demos and reviews their published benchmark scores, availability and cost.모델과 학습BenchmarksAI cost & performance+1