Résultats
15 articlesTrier
22:05EN
Matthew Berman· 9 juin 2025Apple’s “Illusion of Thinking”: Puzzle Limits and a Code-Assisted TestMatthew Berman, Ilya Sutskever · Forward FutureMatthew Berman reviews Apple’s reasoning-model experiments and tests a different way to solve Tower of Hanoi using generated code.
15:13ENMatthew Berman· 10 mai 2025Absolute Zero: Training a Reasoner on Self-Generated Coding TasksMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman examines a 2025 paper in which a pretrained language model proposes and solves code tasks using verifiable feedback.
19:06ENMatthew Berman· 25 avr. 2025Sleep-Time Compute: Preparing AI Context Before a QuestionMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman reviews a 2025 paper on moving some reasoning ahead of a user query, and explains where its experiments found benefits and limits.
15:15ENMatthew Berman· 19 avr. 2025Early Reactions to OpenAI o3 and o4-mini: Tool Use, Math and MistakesMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman reviews 2025 demos and benchmark reports, from location guessing and coding to simple failures that challenge the hype.
15:46ENMatthew Berman· 16 avr. 2025OpenAI o3 and o4-mini: Tool Use, Benchmarks and the First Codex CLIMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman reviews OpenAI’s April 2025 reasoning-model release, a scientific image-analysis demonstration and the debut of its terminal coding agent.
18:05ENMatthew Berman· 16 févr. 2025OpenAI’s Coding-Competition Study: o1-ioi, o3 and the Limits of the ResultsMatthew Berman, Sam Altman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman interprets OpenAI’s 2025 paper on reinforcement learning and programming contests. The results are strong on the studied benchmarks, but do not establish AGI or remove humans from model development.
16:45ENMatthew Berman· 27 janv. 2025DeepSeek-R1 and the Debate Over AI Costs and ComputeMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman examines the January 2025 reaction to an open-weight reasoning model, disputed cost claims and competing views of future demand for AI chips.
21:02ENMatthew Berman· 24 déc. 2024Reactions to OpenAI’s 2024 o3 Preview: Benchmarks, Cost and LimitsMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman surveys the responses to the o3 preview, from mathematical benchmarks to debates about AGI, compute and reliability.
26:23ENMatthew Berman· 20 déc. 2024OpenAI’s o3 Announcement: Benchmark Gains and the Question of AGIMatthew Berman, Sam Altman, Mark Chen, Greg Kamradt, Hongyu Ren · Forward FutureMatthew Berman reviews the December 2024 o3 and o3-mini announcement, including coding, math and ARC-AGI results. He calls the results evidence of AGI, a conclusion the benchmarks alone cannot establish.
24:08ENMatthew Berman· 12 déc. 2024What Apollo’s 2024 Scheming Tests Found in Language ModelsMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman reviews experiments on deceptive actions, concealment and sandbagging, with the study’s staged goals and sandbox limitations in view.
26:43ENMatthew Berman· 10 oct. 2024Testing OpenAI o1 on Planning, Rules and Spatial ReasoningMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman reviews a 2024 pilot study comparing o1-preview, o1-mini and GPT-4 on six planning domains.
21:21ENMatthew Berman· 12 sept. 2024OpenAI o1’s 2024 Launch: Reasoning Benchmarks and Early TestsMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman reviews o1-preview and o1-mini, OpenAI’s reported evaluations, and his own early coding experiments.
17:03ENMatthew Berman· 8 juin 2024Qwen2 0.5B and 72B: A Hands-On ComparisonMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests coding, arithmetic and reasoning prompts on the smallest and largest Qwen2 models in a 2024 demonstration.
17:12ENMatthew Berman· 30 avr. 2024Testing the Mystery 'gpt2-chatbot' Model in April 2024Matthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tries an anonymous model on coding, arithmetic and reasoning tasks while its identity remains uncertain.
22:17ENMatthew Berman· 21 mars 2024Q* Rumors, Energy-Based Models, and Research on ReasoningMatthew Berman, Yann Lecun · Forward FutureMatthew Berman examines an anonymous, unverified account of Q* and compares its ideas with published research on teaching language models to reason.