Thomas Dohmke on AI Assistance for Code Review

The GitHub executive discusses development work, human review and security backlogs.

TDThomas DohmkeGuest · GitHub
Channel
No Priors: AI, Machine Learning, Tech, & Startups
Published
Mar 25, 2026
Video
1:01
Read
1 min
Original
English
Open on YouTube
Scroll to read and the video shrinks to the bottom-right corner. Captions follow your reading language.
Reading languageAvailable in 2 languages
You're reading the original English.
SUMMARY

In 30 seconds

Dohmke expects AI to assist developers while maintaining human review before production.

  1. 1ReviewDohmke says review takes substantial time.
  2. 2Human oversightHe retains a role for human review.
  3. 3AutomationHe proposes assistance with warnings and vulnerabilities.

Takeaways

  1. Developers spend time reviewing code.
  2. Human review remains important in his view.
  3. AI may help with warnings and security backlogs.
FULL TEXT

Read the edited text by chapter

Transcript only
01

How developers spend time

GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke says developers often spend only part of their day writing code and also devote substantial time to reviewing colleagues’ work.

GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke says developers often spend only part of their day writing code and also devote substantial time to reviewing colleagues’ work.

He argues that human review before production remains important for security and trust, even as AI assists the review process.

02

Review and security tools

Dohmke expects code-review agents to help distributed teams and wants scanning tools to assist with fixing vulnerabilities as well as finding them.

Dohmke expects code-review agents to help distributed teams and wants scanning tools to assist with fixing vulnerabilities as well as finding them.

He also cites routine lint and formatting warnings as work that AI could potentially address.

Dohmke hopes automation can reduce security backlogs in open-source and commercial projects, with platform tools supporting cooperation between agents and people. These are his goals, not guaranteed outcomes.

More from this channel

38:06EN
No Priors: AI, Machine Learning, Tech, & Startups· Oct 29, 2026Podcast · 3 speakersServal’s Jake Stauch on coding agents for enterprise ITGuest Jake Stauch · Host Sarah Guo, Elad GilStauch explains why Serval is challenging ServiceNow, how it approaches permissions and approvals, and why background agents remain difficult to deploy safely.Enterprise AICoding agentsWorkflow automation+2
1:07EN
No Priors: AI, Machine Learning, Tech, & Startups· Oct 27, 2026PodcastGeorge Kurtz on How AI May Change CyberattacksGuest George KurtzThe CrowdStrike CEO describes his assessment of evolving threats.
39:23EN
No Priors: AI, Machine Learning, Tech, & Startups· Oct 15, 2026Podcast · 2 speakersThe Defenders' Window: Greg Brockman on AI-Generated Knowledge, Drug Discovery, and the New Physics of CybersecurityHost Sarah Guo, Elad GilOpenAI's president explains why solving open math problems is a proof point for science, how proactive agents change product form, and why security spending must exceed software spending.Security & safetyAI securitySafety & governance+3
1:04EN
No Priors: AI, Machine Learning, Tech, & Startups· Oct 14, 2026PodcastWalter Goodwin on the Slow Steps in Chip DesignGuest Walter GoodwinA chip founder explains why automation does not remove every computational bottleneck.SemiconductorsAI cost & performance
1:09:44EN
No Priors: AI, Machine Learning, Tech, & Startups· Oct 9, 2026Podcast · 2 speakers10,000 GB300s for Four Weeks: Reflection’s Open-Model LedgerHost Sarah Guo, Elad GilMisha Laskin tells No Priors how Reflection trained Beam, why reinforcement learning outspent pre-training, and why the West needs its own open weights.Open source & communityOpen-weight modelsReinforcement Learning+3
0:39EN
No Priors: AI, Machine Learning, Tech, & Startups· Oct 8, 2026PodcastMichael Lee on Rethinking Organizations with AIGuest Michael LeeA business leader argues that the opportunity goes beyond faster tasks.