A Fast Groq Inference Demo Using Mixtral

Matthew Berman demonstrates a Python code request and explains why fast model output could matter for applications.

MBMatthew BermanVortrag · Forward Future
Kanal
Matthew Berman
Veröffentlicht
21. Feb. 2024
Video
0:51
Lesezeit
1 Min.
Folien
1
Original
Englisch
Auf YouTube öffnen
Beim Scrollen schrumpft das Video in die rechte untere Ecke und läuft weiter. Untertitel folgen Ihrer Lesesprache.
LesespracheIn 2 Sprachen verfügbar
Diesen Artikel gibt es noch nicht auf Deutsch, daher wird das Original (Englisch) angezeigt.
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

In 30 Sekunden

In this February 2024 short, Matthew Berman tries Groq’s custom-hardware inference service with Mixtral 8x7B. One displayed Python snake-game response runs at approximately 418.55 tokens per second, according to the interface. This is one historical demonstration, not a controlled comparison of model quality, latency or provider throughput. The video contains no disclosed sponsor.

  1. 1Inference speedBerman says he heard Groq could reach around 500 tokens per second; speed depends on the model and workload.
  2. 2Snake-game requestThe interface displays approximately 418.55 tokens per second for one generated Python response.
  3. 3Custom hardwareBerman attributes the service’s speed to custom hardware and discusses its founder’s Google TPU background.

Das Wichtigste

  1. Berman’s displayed Mixtral response reports 418.55 tokens per second in one example.
  2. His reference to around 500 tokens per second is a separate claim, not the measured speed of this response.
  3. Output token rate, time to first token and total response latency are different measures.
  4. The video does not test whether the generated snake game runs correctly.
  5. Groq’s Mixtral model ID was later deprecated, and historical free access should not be assumed to persist.
VOLLTEXT

Den bearbeiteten Text nach Kapiteln lesen

Nur das Transkript
01

A speed demonstration

Berman explains why inference speed matters to applications and requests a snake game in Python. He reads the displayed output rate.

I have just found Groq and am impressed by reports of inference around 500 tokens per second. Faster output could make language-model applications feel more responsive, although the rate depends on the model, workload and measurement. The short was published in February 2024 and contains no disclosed sponsor.

I ask the service to write a snake game in Python. I say the response takes about two and a half seconds; the screen displays 418.55 tokens per second for this example. That is one interface-reported generation rate, separate from time to first token or end-to-end latency; the video does not run or verify the game.

02

Hardware and access

Berman mentions Groq’s custom hardware and founder. His free-access statement reflects the video’s 2024 context.

Displayed token generation rate
FOLIE 1 / 1Displayed token generation rateThe interface shows 418.55 tokens per second for the demonstrated response.

Groq uses custom inference hardware. Its founder Jonathan Ross previously worked on Google’s TPU, which was developed by a team. I describe the product favorably and say the Mixtral 8x7B 32K service can be tried free at the time. Availability and terms can change: Groq later [deprecated that model ID](https://console.groq.com/docs/deprecations), so the 2024 example is not a current service guarantee.

Mehr aus diesem Kanal

12 Folien34:21EN
Matthew Berman· 27. Okt. 2026Matthew Berman Examines Anthropic’s IPO Filing, AI Growth and GovernanceMatthew Berman, Sam Altman · Forward FutureThe presenter reviews the S-1’s financial metrics, compute strategy and voting structure while questioning the tension between rapid AI development and safety.AnthropicAI SafetyEnterprise-KI+2
0:26EN
Matthew Berman· 25. Okt. 2026Sam Altman on Human Values and Problem-Solving in an AI WorldSam Altman · OpenAIIn a short interview excerpt, Altman considers the enjoyment of solving hard problems and the human role in interpreting results.Human-AI CollaborationFuture of WorkAI Strategy
2 Folien0:36EN
Matthew Berman· 25. Okt. 2026Kimi K3.1 and a Rubik’s Cube Solver DemonstrationMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman shows a scrambled virtual cube being solved and gives the Kimi K3.1 test a favorable assessment.EvalsCoding-AgentenOpen-weight models
2 Folien0:21EN
Matthew Berman· 24. Okt. 2026An AI-Generated Kimi Benchmark Chart Used Invented ScoresMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman asks for a graph of Kimi K3.1 Pro benchmarks, then discovers that the displayed figures are illustrative placeholders.BenchmarksEvalsGenerative media
6 Folien25:50EN
Matthew Berman· 24. Okt. 2026Kimi K3.1 Pro Tested: Strong 3D Demos, Uneven Results and Competitive PricingMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman tests the open-weight model on coding, 3D rendering and visual explanations, then compares benchmark results and prices.Open-weight modelsBenchmarksAI cost & performance+1
2 Folien32:20EN
Matthew Berman· 23. Okt. 2026Who Is Local AI For? The Costs, Trade-offs and a Hybrid FutureMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman weighs data control and independence against hardware cost, setup complexity and inference speed.Local inferenceOpen-weight modelsAI cost & performance+1