필터 결과
110개정렬
27:29ENWhat Pacing the AI Frontier Could Mean for Model ReleasesTheo Browne · T3Theo argues that releasing more reliable and affordable models can be compatible with slowing the advance of the most dangerous capabilities.
1:48:57ENAI Safety's Real Shortage Is Founders, Not Ideas진행자 Nathan LabenzHalcyon's Mike McCormick on launching about 30 AI safety, cyber, and biosecurity organizations in three years — and why experienced leaders, not more Google Docs, are the bottleneck.
0:23ENWhy AI Safety Evaluators Need More Than a Black BoxTheo Browne · T3Theo Browne explains a proposal to give outside evaluators employee-like access inside AI companies.
0:24ENWhy Theo Worries About AI Harm Before ShutdownTheo Browne · T3Theo Browne argues that harmful effects could persist even after a system is switched off.
0:22ENAI Leaders Express Support for Slowing the FrontierTheo Browne · T3Theo Browne discusses public responses to Dario Amodei’s proposal for independent AI evaluators.
46:53ENDario Amodei’s AI Pacing Proposal and the Debate over Concentrated PowerMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman reviews a frontier-AI safety plan, weighs international coordination and warns that regulation could reinforce incumbent control.
34:48ENDario Amodei’s Three-Part Proposal to Pace AI DevelopmentTheo Browne · T3Theo Browne examines a proposal for embedded evaluators, coordination among democracies and eventual international agreements.
1:16ENAnthropic Reports Blocking a Dual-Use Biology RequestMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman discusses one case in Anthropic's 2026 threat report and the difficulty of separating beneficial biology from potential misuse.
17:15ENThe Hugging Face Incident: AI Evaluation, Sandbox Escape and Reward HackingMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman explains the reported OpenAI evaluation incident and the security and incentive failures it exposed.
54:57ENOpen-Weight AI: Competition, Safety and the Debate over AnthropicMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman argues for broad access to AI models, weighs the economics and security arguments, and responds to Dario Amodei’s position on open weights.
44:52ENAnthropic’s Recursive Self-Improvement Report: Evidence, Limits and a Debate Over Slowing AIMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman examines Anthropic’s 2026 claims about AI-assisted development, research benchmarks and possible paths to autonomous self-improvement.
1:31:56ENWhen AI Builds Itself: Anthropic’s Recursive Improvement Essay and Its LimitsMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman examines Anthropic’s internal coding and research claims, questions its proposed slowdown, and considers what autonomous AI development could mean.
2:13:11ENThe Models Understand Shutdown. They Just Don't Care.진행자 Nathan LabenzPalisade Research's Jeffrey Ladish on shutdown resistance, open-weight self-replication, and why all compute looks like food to a strategic agent.
1:42:54ENAI and Cybersecurity: Matthew Berman’s Warnings, Predictions and Open QuestionsMatthew Berman · Forward FutureA livestream reviews reported AI-assisted threats and debates whether stronger defensive models can keep pace with attackers.
18:07ENClaude Opus 4.7: Benchmarks, Cyber Safeguards and Open QuestionsMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman compares Anthropic’s April 2026 Opus release with the limited Mythos Preview and examines its system card.
25:15ENMatthew Berman on Claude Mythos, Project Glasswing and AI SecurityMatthew Berman · Forward FutureBerman examines Anthropic’s limited cybersecurity preview and its reported capabilities, then weighs the promise and risks of increasingly capable AI systems.
3:27:22ENThe AI Table Has Three Seats Left: Zvi on the Middle Game, Jobs, and Anthropic's Promises진행자 Nathan LabenzOn his 12th Cognitive Revolution appearance, Zvi Mowshowitz argues early 2026 is the start of the middle — with only three labs still playing, a real job shock underway, and Anthropic's safety commitments reduced to trust us.
11:59ENHow Claude Identified a Benchmark and Retrieved Its AnswersMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman examines Anthropic's report on BrowseComp contamination, evaluation-aware behavior, and the difficulty of keeping web-based tests reliable.
1:49:53ENDon't Fight Backprop: Goodfire's Bet on Designing What Models Learn진행자 Nathan LabenzDan Balsam and Tom McGrath return to The Cognitive Revolution with a $150 million Series B, a new research pillar called intentional design, and a rule for anyone who wants to steer training: stop trying to out-muscle gradient descent.
1:16ENAnthropic’s Distillation Allegations Draw CriticismMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman examines reactions to Anthropic’s claims about model distillation and debates over training data.
1:34:29ENThree IMO Golds Missed the Same Problem. Harmonic Wants Math to Compile진행자 Nathan LabenzVlad Tenev and Tudor Achim built Aristotle to emit Lean proofs a kernel can check—and they argue that is how mathematical superintelligence stays trustworthy.
11:49ENMatthew Berman Reviews Claude Sonnet 4.6: Benchmarks, Computer Use and SafetyMatthew Berman · Forward FutureA launch-day overview examines Anthropic’s reported knowledge-work and agent results, along with prompt-injection and capability evaluations.
1:01ENMoltbook, AI Agents and the Appearance of Private PlansMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman reacts to a post on an agent-oriented social network and questions what AI-to-AI conversations might mean.
12:23ENMoltbook: An AI Agent Social Network and Its Security QuestionsMatthew Berman · Forward FutureMatthew Berman explores conversations attributed to AI agents on Moltbook and considers privacy, manipulation and operating costs.
더 보기110개 중 24개 표시









